• Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Native Americans and Mexicans owned this land before these orange faced racists showed up.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Years and years and years of Republicans and Conservatives dancing around like confused travolta at the suggestion they are racist bigots. They control all three branches for barely 72 hours and nearly everything they have done has been in support of racism and/or bigotry.

  • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Lmao, Trump is trying to make Native Americans foreigners based on a shit interpretation of an 1800’s law by one of his fascist MAGA lackies who is likely an illiterate dipshit millionaire yes-man.

  • Rivalarrival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The exception is supposed to be for agents of a foreign government: diplomats, soldiers, etc. People who are ordered into the US by their government.

    People who voluntarily come to the US are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

    Trump is trying to say that immigrants fall in the same category as enemy combatants. They can be held in the same way as POWs. Returning them to their country of origin isn’t “deportation”. It’s “repatriation”.

      • Rivalarrival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        “The United States’ connection with the children of illegal aliens and temporary visitors is weaker than its connection with members of Indian tribes. If the latter link is insufficient for birthright citizenship, the former certainly is,” the Trump administration argued.

        Everything they are saying about Native Americans is to support their argument against immigrants.

        The United States’ connection with the children of illegal aliens and temporary visitors is weak…

        I don’t accept this. The people who are not “subject to the jurisdiction” are agents of, or in the service of foreign governments. Like diplomats, spies, or soldiers in an invading army. People following the orders of foreign governments. People paid by foreign governments to be in the US. The US connection to the children of these foreign agents is weaker than the US connection to Native American tribes. The children of these agents don’t have a claim to citizenship under the 14th amendment.

        BUt Private individuals who choose to come to the US are not acting under orders from a foreign government. They come here - legally or illegally - under their own volition. In doing so, they directly subject themselves to US law, which means that their children born in the US fall under the 14th Amendment.

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s likely to justify immediately instituting openly apartheid laws. And the illegitimate Supreme Court will go along with it for this exact purpose.

          • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Pretty sure the documentary I saw and the person they spoke to preferred “Indians” but it’s not like 1 tribe speaks for all of them? You probably should do some research before you sound like my grandpa without his hearing aids, yelling about the “orientals” and embarrassing the fuck out of me.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I have heard different people from that group of humans say they prefer one or the other for different reasons. (A friend of mine once said, “I go with Indian because it doesn’t matter since either name is just one white people gave us.”)

              I tend to go with ‘indigenous Americans’ because ‘indigenous’ is a word used for such peoples all over the planet and generally is difficult to argue against as an inoffensive and descriptive term.

              • shastaxc@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                This is pretty off topic but I’ve been wondering: how far back in the past do you stop before considering people indigenous? For example, my family immigrated to America from Europe about 200 years ago. Does that mean I’m native to europe? Indians are believed to have come from Russia through Alaska thousands of years ago. Does that mean they’re indigenous to Russia? If you go back far enough, we’re all from Africa.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  “Indigenous” generally means “pre-colonial.” As in they didn’t forcibly take over the land from someone else as far as we know.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I’m just naturally assuming Trump quoting language from the 1800s is going to be offensive to somebody…

              • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                A broken clock is correct twice a day. Never let your bias cloud your vision, your judgement, and reality.

                • PwnTra1n@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  a stopped clock might be right twice a day but a broken clock might never be right depending on how broken it is.