buckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoGoogle encourages "protecting your business against costly state regulations"infosec.pubimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1238arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1229arrow-down1imageGoogle encourages "protecting your business against costly state regulations"infosec.pubbuckbanzai@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecm0002@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·21 hours agoNot to defend Google, but it has nothing to do with shame and everything to do with marketing. If you read the URL as a sentence supportsmallbiz.withgoogle.com = Support Small Biz With Google
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·21 hours agoThey could have done smallbizzwith.google.com but are hiding it and they will pretend that it doesn’t exist once they shut down the site. We’ve seen this already a few time at various companies.
minus-squareChozo@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4·20 hours agoHow is that any more hidden? Unless you already know the subdomain in the first place, the domain doesn’t really make much difference.
Not to defend Google, but it has nothing to do with shame and everything to do with marketing.
If you read the URL as a sentence supportsmallbiz.withgoogle.com = Support Small Biz With Google
They could have done smallbizzwith.google.com but are hiding it and they will pretend that it doesn’t exist once they shut down the site. We’ve seen this already a few time at various companies.
How is that any more hidden? Unless you already know the subdomain in the first place, the domain doesn’t really make much difference.
A bit more plausible deniability