• Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Apparently yeah. In fact, it’s actually easy to tell which years are in the 2nd millenium just by knowing its final year.

    But people chose to celebrate the new millenium in 2000 because it’s much more fun to have every single digit in a calendar year change than having only one digit change and calling it “a new millenium”. Also, January 1, 2000 looks and feels so much cooler in my opinion, unless you write it in the dd/mm/yy format (mm/dd/yy wouldn’t make much of a difference), in which case 01/01/01 has that nice satisfying feeling of all variables being the same value.

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Apparently yeah. In fact, it’s actually easy to tell which years are in the 2nd millenium just by knowing its final year.

      That was the point of my question, the disbelief of “wait, 2k is the last year and not 1999?”

      And I think it would be even easier if one could just look at the thousands digit and tell from that. It would be even more easier if the millennia and years and such were all 0-indexed, so you’d have the zeroth millennium spanning 0-999, the first millennium 1000-1999, the 19th century would be 1900-1999…