• Kairos
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Armchair psychology by your local dipshit:

    Depression tends to be irrational, and thus thought processes around it tend to be irrational.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “if i can’t have it, nobody should have it”

      also applies to everyone who opposes progress because they had it hard in life

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If I was in power we’d deal with them alright. Forced relocation to Bitterville, with a dictatorial mayor hell bent on fixing nothing.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I kinda get that. Its like trying to be happy for a billionaire who lives in a castle whilst you can barely afford rent.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          this doesn’t really apply to billionaires, the same people who oppose things like student debt forgiveness will also lick billionaires’ boots and present them as the role models of the “american dream”

          it’s the bitter people who had it hard in life, and think new generations having it easier is something bad, it’s unfair, even though as a civilisation we should all strive to make life easier for those who come after us. but no “if i had it bad in life, you have to go through the same, or you’re not really [insert whatever group you feel like, man/woman/american/minority]”, as if struggle and suffering was a right of passage

        • moriquende@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Except people having it easier due to progress comes at the cost of nobody, while billionaires having it good comes at great cost to everybody but them.

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d argue that progress always comes at a cost to something, loss of jobs, rarer to mine minerals, loss in quality to meet demand, etc. But I hear ya

            • currycourier@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Yea for sure, but the cost-benefit is usually (hopefully) pretty skewed. Like even redistributing wealth from billionaires comes at a ‘cost’ to the billionaires, but the downside is their bank account number is smaller (which, who cares). I know you’re not disagreeing btw, just adding to the discussion.