Could someone remind me what the appeal behind Void is exactly?
no systemd IIRC.
I have enough void inside me already
As one of the dozens of Void Linux users, I too find this very offensive!
(But hey, at least we’re getting some attention, which is nice…)
Why isn’t Manjaro the one in the meme?
I use manjaro and you said nothing but facts.
I just quit Manjaro about two months ago and i agree.
I haven’t tried Manjaro and I don’t have an opinion
You’re using the meme wrong. The “at home” needs to be worse than the “mom can we get?”
I don’t agree with it being a cheap version of arch, it works too good for that, it deserves more respect
Frankly I’d much rather have void. Super cool distro, a lot of things about it seem like an ideal fit for me, I just don’t really have the technical skill to get a minimal distro all set up the way I want it
Plus their logo is pretty. Which shouldn’t matter but like, look at it- it’s a cool logo!
Yes, the install process is difficult to perform. But once you do it, you’ll feel like a wizard. You learn so much from the process if you do a manual chroot install. It helps you understand how the installation process for other distros like Debian works. If you have some free time, I would recommend trying it in a virtual machine.
I tried when I set up my new laptop and definitely learned a ton, but eventually stalled at getting network manager setup so I could use GNOME settings to configure networks, and getting sound set up
I completely forgot about trying it in a VM, I may have to go give that a try!
If it had package kit implementation so I could use a graphical package manager/app store it’d basically be my perfect distro if I could get it set up the way I want. An independent distro, super elegant, if I understand right the packages are all vanilla, “stable rolling release”. I really like it, a minimal distro is just a bit beyond me skill-wise, and I’d miss having a way to browse native (non-flatpak) applications graphically
Sorry to hear about the network manager issues! I could be wrong on this, but I think Gnome is not the best supported DE in void - possibly because of how heavily tied it is to systemd. I wish I could help, but I still configure my wifi using
wpa_supplicant.conf. Maybe dbus wasn’t setup properly?Regarding audio, the pipewire documentation for Void is pretty good. It’s pretty thematic of the whole Void linux experience: you have to read the handbook and follow its steps closely, but it’s very well written and easy to understand. It can definitely be time-consuming as well though.
Void is definitely all the things you mentioned. I installed it on a few machines, the first in early 2020 and it has never given me an issue. Extremely stable and boring. I’m impressed that it has so many packages in its repository, but that’s a testament to how well
xbpsis written. But there are a few things missing since it’s fair from the mainstream, including packagekit. I had never heard of it before you mentioned it - I found a fork on github to support it, but it doesn’t look very well maintained.
the only thing void has over arch is more architecture support (which is kinda ironic)
How dare you.
Was I supposed to be paying for arch this whole time?
Oh, you paid for it, don’t worry.
I’m always baffled when people use void as a desktop. Anyone do this?
I do. I like it. I don’t think it tries to fill the same niche as Arch, as a former Arch daily driver.
Why? Any distro can be used for anything.
Is void a distro?
Yes. Independent, rolling, stable.
rolling, stable
Huh?
It was Antergos for me, before the project was shut down.
