• namarupa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t see where his argument was about lifetime earning potential. Seems to be just simply women with children make less money, which seems reasonable.

    I also don’t see anywhere he even implied that salary and lifetime earning potential were the same thing. And salary would be reflected in lifetime earning potential.

    What is your position? I’m not even certain what the point of your disagreement is.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      And all was well in the fediverse

      Hopefully the deleted commenter doesn’t see this but if you do thank you!

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I have come to the conclusion that their position is mental illness, because everything they’ve typed so far is non-sensical.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hey, it’s been 12 hours and this might be worth a revisit with a fresh perspective. The parent commenter was plenty pleasant, I would say.