• BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No. It takes a truly shallow mind to come to this conclusion. Most of us Democrats understand how politics work and knew it was Trump or Harris once Biden stepped down. That’s it, no third option. Only a true idiot or a Trump supporter (same thing) would think not voting, voting this party, it voting for Trump was in anyway better for Israel, Ukraine, and America.

    • dwindling7373@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not really. If your focus is beyond the next 4 years, you can argue letting Democrats lose is the best strategy to stop wars on the planet down the line.

      In fact if Kamala was going to loose either way (as it happened) it’s a good thing that she lost hard.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Accelerationist arguments always show that the speaker isn’t nearly as smart as they think they are.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Anyone who makes that argument has no idea how bad things can get and how fast.

            • dwindling7373@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 minutes ago

              Yes?

              So if the camps were happening either way, better not to vote for the guy that says “vote me and the camps will have regulations in regard to human experimentation!” and strictly go for “fuck that shit”.

              I get people still being affected by the election topics, but it’s not now.