• jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    But like you say, they can just fork it. So let them do that. What’s the problem? Everything else is kind of out of context.

    • Allero
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The problem is mainline Linux will now not receive collaboration efforts from Russians, which will influence the speed and course of its development.

      Not saying Linux is gonna stall without Russians, but they do have a measurable impact on open-source development and introduce a lot of exotic things into the kernel, which allows it to be used with more devices and accelerates development of alternative technologies.

      It’s a lose-lose situation.

      Besides, seeing other contributors removed for seemingly nothing but their nationality might disincentivise developers in other countries, too.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just factually wrong. Russian maintainers were removed from their positions. They are still allowed to contribute, but they’ll have to get a non-Russian maintainer to sign off on it. This removes “FSB coerces Russian maintainer into signing off on malware” as an attack vector, while having the minimum possible impact on Russian contributors whose code will be checked for correctness like anyone else’s.