• Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So hold on, no troops in Ukraine, because they’re not NATO, but troops in Israel no problem?

    Or is it because US is scared shitless of Putin? Or is it because a lot of prople sympathise eith Putin?

    Maybe there’s no profit in aiding Ukraine?

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      We have a top secret base there, just like Korea and Vietnam early troops usually come in and break shit you can’t let go.

      No it’s because Russia is preoccupied and we’re testing near peer weapons from 3+decades ago there with little to no risk to mainland usa. It’s morally wrong sure but it does at least make sense.

      I mean sorta but not really, we’re selling most stuff at a loss. The benefit is really seeing how well our stuff works against the enemy or was designed to fight. Don’t get me wrong people are getting rich but that’s from buying more weapons to replace the ones we sold.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      If Putin didn’t have the nuclear card in his pocket US boots would have been on the ground in Ukraine 2 years ago.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh shit. Either he’s trolling Harris’s campaign or they really are a cult. Very popular decision joe, sure people will forget till november.

    • logos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I got to believe Bibi has him by the balls somehow. It’s the only thing that makes sense.

      Can we article 25 this fool? Harris might have a better chance if she’s already been president for a bit anyway.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        It’s quite obvious the Israelis have many US politicians either in their payroll, or have dirt on them. That-s pretty much standard operating procedure for the Israeli intelligence services. They are masters at those things. All you have to see is their depth of infiltration in Muslim countries.

        I hate that, but I must admit they are impressive.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        Governments and rulers had every peasant below them by the balls for centuries. What are you going to do about troops being deployed to aid israel?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        You think it’s just Biden that has hands in this? Israel would never have been so bold if the USA didn’t move it’s embassy to Jerusalem and that choice was not Bidens.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But Harris will most likely just send more troops. She did confirm she „supports” israel.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    US President Joe Biden has said he is “absolutely, positively” urging Israel to stop firing at UN peacekeepers during its conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon, following two incidents in 48 hours. Source

    Some hours later: Biden absolutely, positively sends troops to help Israel out. WTF…

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It isn’t bad enough that we’re arming the genocide and the unchecked aggression against Israel’s neighbors? Now we’ve got to fucking participate in it?

    • Anas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’ve already been participating: The failed aid pier had one use, and it was a military one.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Now we’ve got to fucking participate in it?

      Ah yes, killing all those innocent civilians hidden in incoming Iranian ballistic missiles…

      • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Right. We will be defending Israel from the incoming Iranian ballistic missiles after they kill innocent civilians on a scale larger than they already have been, prompting a response from Iran large enough that the iron dome is not capable of handing it. Which totally doesn’t make us participants. We’re not directly doing the bloodshed, just enabling it and defending Israel from feeling any consequences.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I hate how I can’t even comfort myself by knowing this idiocy will cost them the election because these fucks are the less horrible option.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yep, this is coming from the most ‘leftist’ candidates we are allowed to vote for. Pretty fucked up options we get to choose from. I hate it here.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I feel so bad for the people being deployed and their families. These people are being positioned to be triggers for a war against Iran. They believe it will be easier to manufacture consent for that war if the administration (whichever one we have) can point to dead Americans. Sick shit.

  • Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There is a lot about this that is nuts, but one thing that really jumps out at me.

    It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

    But with this I have to ask: are Biden and Harris assisting with a plan that is clearly intended to cost Harris the election?

    I want to say that they surely must’ve told Israel not to launch anything before election day. But based in their actions so far, it doesn’t seem like they’re imposing a “no election interference against us personally” requirement as a condition of their assistance.

    I guess we’ll see.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

      Do you realize that israel government is waging war only because they are backed by USA?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel–Hamas_war

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If Harris is in on a plan to strike Iran it wouldn’t cost her the election in the US. All they have to do is say, “We received credible intelligence that Iran had decided to sprint for a nuclear warhead. We had to act in a timely manner.”

      What would cost her the election is if an American soldier dies to an Iranian missile and Biden/Harris doesn’t immediately go hard on Iran. Which makes this a ridiculously irresponsible move by Biden.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The insanity is not that it is Republicans or Democrats

      The insane part is that America is just sleep walking straight into a war that will probably escalate into something much bigger and no one wants to do anything about it.

      God help us all

    • Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Their messaging so far to Israel has been “do whatever the fuck you want, 💰💰”

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        She most likely was in the room when Biden authorized the troops you know. She is very much on the same page as Biden on this.

        Sucks you guys don’t have any other option.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is a weird thing to say, but I actually don’t think that there’s any indication that Harris or Trump would do anything substantially different with regard to Israel, but the biggest change is that if Trump wins, I suspect that coverage of this will disappear behind all the coverage of his domestic chaos. At least if Harris is president I think there is a chance we see the press maintain a modicrum of interest in covering this.

        Either way, words can’t describe my anger that Harris appears to be prepared to throw the election over her support for genocide. It is an unreal situation to watch.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            41 minutes ago

            No intelligent person should vote for a party supporting a genocide either. Israel government is finishing the job already.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So the one says it out loud, the other just keeps the intention quiet.

            Both are equally sending weapons.

            However with Trump we saw that he pulled American soldiers out of the region and he is much more unstable. So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              7 hours ago

              So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

              That would require him to give a shit about the soldiers dying to make a change. His history says the exact opposite of that. Soldiers dying would do absolutely nothing towards whether he changes anything.

              • Saleh@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Trump pulled most troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sure he doesnt care about the soldiers life, but he isnt committed to being a war hawk. He just does random stuff.

                • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  The troop withdrawal was already being worked before Trump even started campaigning. He just decided to speed it up dramatically so he could say he achieved something, and promised a deadline that was unattainable while doing it well. It’s not random, it’s narcissism at the expense of everything else, including the country.

        • Zexks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’ll disappear by him shutting down all news organizations and outlawing any dissenting opinions. He’s straight up said it. There is no functional difference on this issues between them. It’s the ancillary consequences trump will impose on everyone that is why he should be fired into the sun as an example.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Trump would tell Netanyahu to nuke the place and he’d fucking do it. It would be a catastrophe the likes of which we haven’t seen since WWII.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      if they money you get from AIPAC is more than the money you get as US presidency and without the headache of being president, I wounder if Kamala care enough to be a president.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It feels like they are totally beholden to Israel.

      If they push back hard, they alienate swing voters who like Israel from the old days, aka apocalypse.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is actually a persistent myth: there is no evidence that they are beholden to a constituency that would punish them for any actions that curtail Israel.

        Israel’s actions are wildly unpopular across the electorate. They are unpopular with nearly all Democrats as well as most independents and a very large plurally of Republicans. I have seen numerous polls that show that there is a very significant number of voters that Harris is losing over this, and I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate that there is any measurable cost to her speaking out against Israel at all. Which is really sad. Because it means that this is absolutely a moral choice on her part. This is not an electoral choice at all.

        https://truthout.org/articles/poll-endorsing-israel-arms-embargo-would-boost-harriss-support-to-49-percent/

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        A majority of Americans are against the action in Gaza. It is a popular opinion not to support it, unless you’re a major donor.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          So in the last few weeks, Biden can pull support as much as possible basically giving Bibi the finger. Any funding that dries up is unlikely to have more of an effect than pulling support. This helps Harris win. Then she can re-woo them over the next 4 years.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          A majority of those who actually turn out to vote are pro Israel (and no, people under 35 don’t vote in other countries where they have more options, so cut the “they don’t vote because of the support for Israel” bullshit, they don’t vote because they’re young and don’t care)

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Okay, well the Harris campaign can continue claiming that the reason she’s down in the polls in Michigan has nothing to do with Gaza.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Perhaps if he does that, then Joe and Harris will be forced to materially change their tune and take some real action in an attempt to save the elction.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As an aside, “THAAD battery” sounds like someone harnessed exasperation towards a rich kid and converted it into electricity 😁

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Biden is really trying to start a whole new war and make the Democrats lose this election.

    • ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Honestly, I think Biden supports this unwaveringly because it aligns with US policy to keep the region destabilized.

      I mean they helped overthrow the Shah, aided the Taliban in fighting the soviets, invaded Iraq and Kuwait (which led directly to the creation of jihadist state – ISIS), aided a US-aligned faction in the Syrian civil war, helped put down the 2011 democratic revolutions… there is so much more.

      And for what? To keep them from realizing they are all arabs and are sitting on the largest collective reserves of oil in the world…

      Evil Empire.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        helped put down the 2011 democratic revolutions…

        Holy shit tell me more. I’m an Arab and this is my first time hearing of this.

        • shaserlark@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I found a paper on this here: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/arabstudquar.35.3.0255

          Seems like they were actually on the side of the dictators in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen until they realized that they’d collapse. I think Libya is very well remembered, they just completely ruined what was formerly a stable, wealthy country (although a dictatorship of course).

          Also especially in Egypt when the elections didn’t turn out the way they wanted it because the Muslim Brotherhood candidate won, they backed the regime change and since then Egypt has a new dictator loyal to the US and Israel.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      He is petty enough to do that. We’ll and doesn’t seem to give a shit about what terrible things Israel does

      • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Biden has always been a narcissist. And many 80 year olds do get pretty petty and selfish, from what I’ve seen. We really need an age cap on government service so we dont have to go through this again. On supreme court justices and congressman too. Dying on the bench or in office of old age is wildly unacceptable for such important roles. GTFO.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Either he’s making too much money from AIPAC to stop now. Or he’s bitter about being pushed out of the race for president this election. Or both.

        • Walteracc@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Or he’s a true believer. He’s admitted to being a Zionist. The man has a history of being as Pro Israeli as humanly possible to the detriment of everyone else.

          This is just who Biden is. His lack of morals make him believe Israel is doing the right thing.

          • Vanon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Agreed. It seems Biden decided at some point that he must side with Israel, no matter the cost. (I’m sure Iran intel is not helping.) Netanyahu sees no downside to ruthlessly using this against him, with a bonus of helping elect a more useful idiot.

            I’m not sure if Biden has jelly for brains these days. The poor fool has been getting increasingly humiliated by Israel for a year. It’s painful to watch, along with the devastation it’s caused.

  • basmati@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Well time to find out if Iran has a nuke and if we get to solve climate change by inducing a nuclear winter(yes I know nuclear winter isn’t real).

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      yes I know nuclear winter isn’t real

      That’s not a consensus view.

      According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal Nature Food in August 2022, a full-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia, which together hold more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons, would kill 360 million people directly and more than 5 billion indirectly by starvation during a nuclear winter.

      Another paper published that year, from the Tohoku University Earth science scholar Kunio Kaiho, compared the impact of nuclear winter scenarios on marine and terrestrial animal life with that of historical extinction events. Kaiho estimated that a minor nuclear war (which he defined as a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan or an event of equivalent magnitude) would cause extinctions of 10–20% of species on its own, while a major nuclear war (defined as a nuclear exchange between United States and Russia) would cause the extinctions of 40–50% of animal species…

      Wikipedia

      • basmati@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        There isn’t currently a scientific consensus, as wikipedia should be pointing out, with studies differing massively depending mostly on what model of soil uptake and preservation in atmosphere is used.

        We know that the majority of in air debris would not come from the explosion, which is designed to minimize fallout in all modern weapons and deployment models, but from the resulting fires. We also know from previous tests the resulting fires don’t actually last long as they tend to burn through areas quickly.

        In short it’s not a sure thing, and if any cooling effect does occur it wouldn’t start to touch the average heating we’ve introduced through climate change.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That long Wikipedia article conveys quite well how there isn’t consensus. We don’t know how bad it would be, because our various best models give different results. But to say it’s not a sure thing is different from saying “nuclear winter isn’t real,” which suggests a consensus that it won’t happen.

  • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    100 troops is not enough to invade Iran, you silly armchair-general fucks commenting here.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not the point.

      What happens when Iran manages to kill an American soldier a week before the election?

      • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Anti missile and aircraft systems are obviously the #1 targets in any attack. And the Israelis gain much more by letting them get hit than by making sure those units are protected in any way. They might even secretly shoot at them themselves to speed things up. I would not want to be one of those THAAD operators.

    • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, but 100 dead troops is enough to grandstand about to get enough outrage to justify an all-out war in the region.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Unless the US military is stupid to keep all 100 of them in a single easily bombable location, there’s no fucking way on this green earth a single one of them will die in any combat, especially if they are simply manning air defense outposts spread across the country like what the article that no one here reads actually said.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Fun fact, Air Defense is a priority target in missile saturation attacks because it makes it easier for follow on missiles to hit their targets.

          • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            Even funner fact: anyone remember the USS Liberty? A common thought is Israel did that to pull us into their war then. Nowadays you would have a presidential candidate boldly declaring that [insert ‘vile’ country of choice] killed our troops and we must rush to war against them. I bet there are israeli leaders just salivating at the idea of repeating the scenario.