• summarizer@group.ltB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Much of the fallow land lies in a vast swath along the front line of the war, while other fields are in areas recently retaken by Ukrainian forces, she says.

    Becker-Reshef says that while overall, Ukraine has been able to maintain its agricultural output this year, the abandoned fields have already cost the nation around $2 billion in lost crops.

    Precise estimates of how much artillery ammunition has been used in the war so far are hard to come by, but Russian and Ukrainian forces are firing thousands of rounds a day, according to Michael Kofman, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    “These can lay in the ground for over a hundred years and still be lethal,” says Iain Overton, the executive director of Action on Armed Violence, a British non-profit that focuses on the harm caused by explosive weapons.

    Still, Overton says, the amount of unexploded ordnance, land mines, and toxic pollution in farmland along the front line will make returning those fields to production a “gargantuan task.”

    The destruction of the Kakhovka Dam earlier this year drained a massive reservoir and left nearly a thousand miles of irrigation channels without a source of water.


    The original article contains 1,186 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that a major input to the cost of clearing unexploded ordinance is the depth to which one wants to clear. I read a RAND study a while back that did this analysis. Clearing just the very top bit of the soil, which I suppose will handle land mines that are more-or-less where they were originally placed, is much less expensive than having to clear explosives underground in an area to a depth of one meter.

      https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_briefs/2005/RAND_RB9124.pdf

      My guess is that artillery is more-liable to wind up leaving UXO underground. I’d also guess that trenchlines are prone to the problem. And there were some landmines that were washed away after Russia blew the Kakhova Dam.

      So in general, I’d guess that clearing areas of landmines is going to be easier than clearing areas that have seen major artillery battles.