• WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They don’t have any, they just know you’re supposed to say “take to the streets” because they think they’re a 1960s radical rehearsing boomer protest tactics. As though things might not have changed in the last 60 years.

    Counter-protest tactics have continuously adapted and evolved – from technology to legislation to media manipulation. Protest tactics have not kept pace, evidenced by the fact that this person thinks street protests have created effective change in the last 20 years.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If you follow the thread here, this is in a US context (the “we” referenced by the commenter), and it’s about “non-violent” protests, given the commenter said violent protests have been “protracted” with “low rates of success.” Euromaidan activists seized the government quarter by force and stormed Yanukovych’s mansion.

        While I take your point, this isn’t a particularly illustrative example in this context.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          No this is exactly what it looks like. They filled the streets and they didn’t go into his mansion until he fled after the Army turned on him for using lethal force against the crowd.

          Just like the water hoses and dogs picture was very resonant in the US. The 1964 civil rights act was passed the next year after that photo went viral.

          • Rivalarrival
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The 1964 civil rights act was passed the next year after that photo went viral.

            A year is an extraordinarily long time with an illegitimate occupant of the White House, pardoning himself for anything he chooses to do.

            I don’t think the measures that were effective during the civil rights era are at all suitable for addressing such a fundamental breach of the constitution.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              That was because the remedy protestors asked for was legislative and they accepted legislative lag as a reality.

              The remedy if Trump or SCOTUS fucks around is immediate abdication.