• @MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59 hours ago

    They’ve started serving ads when you skip backwards. Drives me fucking nuts.

    I was willing to use the mobile app with ads because the interface is slightly less buggy.

    Ad blocking on mobile web it is for me now 👍

  • @sentientity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4418 hours ago

    It’s excellent that alternatives and ad blockers do exist but we need regulatory action to hold companies accountable for things that are designed to worsen user experience to pressure people into paying. It’s also a serious accessibility issue, to increasingly have everything be bright and loud and motion filled and unpausable all the time. This trend goes beyond YouTube and it sucks, we need to regulate this nonsense.

    • @erenkoylu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      governments will not do anything that upsets the big companies like Google. Adblockers are are only defence against Google and others.

    • @Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 hours ago

      It’s pretty stupid to introduce ads on the pause screen. Usually I would pause something because I am either:

      A) Being interrupted and need to focus on something else like a phone call or a family member talking to me, and wouldn’t be paying attention to the screen anyways.

      B) Need to leave to go somewhere else like the fridge for a snack and wouldn’t be paying attention to the screen anyways.

      Or

      C) Just want to take a break and want to do something else which involves opening another window or program and wouldn’t be paying attention to the window with YouTube open.

      In every scenario where I pause YouTube and add playing would not provide any value to the entity paying YouTube to play the ad.

      And in every scenario, if an ad began playing when I pause youtube it would cause me to mute my sound and/or turn off my monitor and just cause me to get super annoyed at YouTube or at whatever product is being advertised and how to never buy it ever.

    • @dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -3317 hours ago

      What a weird downslope of a take that will obviously result in authoritarian government power expansion and futher censorship.

      Just stop using it and support alternatives that dont do it. Have some self control.

      • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1516 hours ago

        Name a single viable alternative to YouTube at this point in time. Alternative frontends don’t count, since they still rely on YouTube to work. None of the creators I watch upload anywhere else.

      • @sentientity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        716 hours ago

        People always say shit like this as if people don’t have a multitude of different life circumstances that affect and coerce how they interact with technology. That’s just how capitalism works. It’s not a matter of willpower. Privacy Bootstraps Theory is unhelpful. Being able to completely opt out of entrenched tech monopolies is a privilege. It’s great that you can do that, not everybody can.

      • @Cyteseer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        414 hours ago

        Do you think regulations are just blanket authoritarian actions. Sometimes we need government intervention to ensure and protect people’s rights.

      • Cadenza
        link
        fedilink
        English
        213 hours ago

        Regulating capitalism = authoritarianism. What a weird take. Regulating capitalism =/= abolishing capitalism, this I can understand. But your take… wow.

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      918 hours ago

      or invidious, grayjay, ytdl, etc…

      • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
        link
        fedilink
        English
        218 hours ago

        I agree, but most Invidious instances are currently broken, Grayjay isn’t really FOSS and youtube-dl/yt-dlp aren’t really great for watching videos, they’re better for archiving them.

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          216 hours ago

          Invidious: News to me. My instance has never been down.
          GrayJay: News to me… https://github.com/futo-org/grayjay-android I can see the full source… and the license seems pretty “free” to me… https://github.com/futo-org/grayjay-android/blob/master/LICENSE.md with only caveat being that you can’t distribute it for payment. I’m fine with that… and most others should be fine with that too.
          ytdl: depends on the service using it. https://www.tubearchivist.com/ uses ytdl and gives you a little frontend for it. Works fine for watching and you can set it to watch for uploads from channels.

          • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
            link
            fedilink
            English
            114 hours ago

            If you host your own private instance, it’s less likely to get blocked. But quite a few public instance are having trouble right now.

            Grayjay is source-available, but not free & open-source software.

            Downloading YouTube videos works, but it’s probably not the desired workflow for most people. It takes up storage space on your disk, and you have to wait for the video to download, before you can watch it. I like Tube Archivist, and use it myself for archiving videos, but I wouldn’t consider it a great solution for just watching videos. I think LibreTube, FreeTube or a self-hosted Invidious instance are better solutions here.

    • @Kadaj21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 hours ago

      I’m betting these wont work on a Roku Tv huh? Kiddo likes putting music videos for shapes and beats but the constant POLITICAL ads are driving me nuts.

  • @x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7224 hours ago

    And good people argue how adblock and sponssrblock are fair game for your shitty company practices

    • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2722 hours ago

      I’d rather see them on pause screen than interrupting the playback but because we can’t have any nice things, interruptions will also only get worse.

      • @Grenfur@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2221 hours ago

        Yeah, I guarantee you google isn’t interested in showing you one or the other. They want the revenue from both. My only question is, if you pause an ad, can you get another ad in your ad?

    • @interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      You’re joking but infinite growth is the broken basis of our financial system. Shareholder are legally entitled to request growth.

      YouTube has cornered the earth market, they have practically no room to grow, the only thing they have left is to increase the revenue per view, so ad stuffing will get worse quarter after quarter. Eventually they’ll have to put ads in the ads and play them 5 at a time.

      • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        414 hours ago

        And yet people still say “if you don’t like ads, pay up” as if getting ads in a subscription is not a matter of time, like it’s happening to streaming.

        • @ThunderComplex
          link
          English
          14 hours ago

          Yeah and YouTube already has a “pay money but still get ads plan”. And they’ll likely continue raising prices on all plans

  • @Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    761 day ago

    This already happened. People looking up CPR instructions because a loved one is dying, only to be met with three unskippable ads.

    Goodbye Meemaw.

    • Lord Wiggle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1723 hours ago

      Yeah, that may be so, but priorities man. Priorities! Think of our profits man! In this harsh economy, ever ad counts! We’re only controlling 90% of the internet while we strive for 100%. That’s 10% short. 10%! We only had a revenue of 305 billion in 2023 which is not nearly enough to cut down on ads. Billionaire lives matter man! Come on, everybody, say it all together: Make millionaires billionaires again! Billionaires first! Meemaws don’t consume enough anyway. Screw her. By the way, want some penis enlargement pills?

    • @Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 hours ago

      Proof? Aren’t there classes of videos non monetized on youtube? When I just google search for cpr and find the american red cross I quickly found written instructions as well as a youtube video that doesn’t appear to have any ads. Isn’t the problem that some video creators intentionally create videos for CPR in hopes of monetizing?

      • dch82
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/83733719?hl=en

        This means as a creator that’s not in YPP [Youtube Partner Program], you may see ads on some of your videos. Since you’re not currently in YPP, you won’t receive a share of the revenue from these ads, though you’ll still have the opportunity to apply for YPP as you normally would once you meet the eligibility requirements.

        • @Copernican@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Thanks for the checking. I think the whole argument is pretty wild and specious, and factually suspect, that someone died because a person couldn’t look up the cpr video on time. YouTube is not a platform that is meant to deliver on demand life saving training. In NYC all the restaurants and workplaces have signs up in designated areas with instructions on how to do cpr. I suspect someone is going to more quickly look up written instructions or infographics if they need to Google. But really, this just speaks to the importance in staying up to date on CPR practices and having school and HR classes that teach this on a recurring basis. Using this as an argument against all ads is kind of nuts.

          Also, the first step of most CPR instructions is call 911. So if you follow instructions, how are you watching a video on the phone? And can’t the operator coach you through the steps? https://www.redcross.org/take-a-class/cpr/performing-cpr/cpr-steps

    • @retrieval4558@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -311 day ago

      Not defending YouTube here, but CPR is so time sensitive that if they were looking up instructions, she was a goner anyway.

      • @baru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        341 day ago

        Have you had CPR training? What you stated isn’t true. Every second counts. But looking up instructions and seeing a easy video will still help massively.

        • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          117 hours ago

          Exactly. It takes over a minute for permanent brain damage from a lack of oxygen, and it can take several, several minutes before actual death.

          CPR started anytime within that range will help keep the person alive, as you are literally forcing their body to intake oxygen and pump the blood.

          If you find someone without a heart beat and they aren’t already cold then call 911 and start cpr

      • YeetPics
        link
        fedilink
        English
        418 hours ago

        Hey look, a blatant lie disguised as a fact!

        I wonder how this furthers your agenda…

  • @danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3224 hours ago

    Just gonna say I hate this when other apps do this. I pause cause I need to concentrate on something else. Showing an ad just makes that even harder. Now I have to pause AND close the app.

    • @Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      518 hours ago

      If only YouTube ads were as unobtrusive as PornHub’s… one five-second-skippable ad before each video is all I’ve ever seen

    • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
      link
      fedilink
      English
      319 hours ago

      Except the ads on porn sites are easier to block than YouTube’s intrusive garbage. A simple DNS filter should be enough for most porn ads, whereas YouTube requires more complex blocking techniques.

    • @lemmeout@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Long gone are the days when I used be excited to read update notes for new features… Now I just hope they don’t god damn force an update on me.

      • @msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 day ago

        Just use Free and Open Source Software!

        It can always fuck up with updates, but usually you just get more free stuff and it’s awesome.

      • PhreakyByNature
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 day ago

        I went back to an old APK of Twitch and refuse to update to the current dumpster fire.

        • @anton2492@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 day ago

          I use PurpleTV and it’s been great. It’s a Twitch fork modified to block ads, reduce bloat, and include customisation for chat, player and other components.

          Don’t know if we can share links here but the APK can be easily found online, still being updated semi-regularly. I won’t come back to the official app as long as I’m able. :)

          • PhreakyByNature
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 day ago

            Cheers for that. I had other third party apps way back in the day but they lacked some features. Will check it out.

    • @spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      581 day ago

      Somewhere along the line, maybe the early to mid 2000’s they stopped making products “for” the end-user and flipped it around so the end-user (their data) is now the product, and the customers are governments, corporations, and share holders.

      • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 hours ago

        shareholders

        If 0.000…01% shareholders count:

        Guessing a lotta us have a few bucks in index funds… suppose that ain’t cool, gotta find a principled fund.

        The most principled funds must only invest in like three companies cuz every corp has some problem.

      • @omarfw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 day ago

        Because those shareholders (billionaires) and corporations drained the consumers of all of their money and now they’re the most profitable demographic to market to.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 day ago

      That’s part of the reason why new community oriented projects are way more interesting to me now than most software. There are some outliers in the space who still have dedicated people in their craft rather than for money but it is fewer and farther between.

    • @loam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 day ago

      Absolutely. Although, this is just making old technology worse because web 3.0 and AI aren’t performing to corpo expectations.

    • Jeffool
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Great point. I already find this to be a problem with the recommendations that pop up when paused, and the end-video elements they throw over everything despite having that turned off everywhere I can find it. It’s all so dumb. Just so damn dumb.

    • @noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 day ago

      I don’t think Peertube would handle mass migration of Youtube creators, unless each and every one of them set up their own instance.

      • L3ft_F13ld!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 day ago

        I’d honestly be curious to see how that plays out. Every creator hosts their own content while strengthening and spreading the Peertube network.

        I feel like that would quickly solidify it as a viable alternative.

          • @Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            219 hours ago

            In time the technical knowledge requirements may be reduced. I could see a small company selling pre-setup media servers with a couple TB of storage. Just plug it in, load up your videos and your basically done.

            And if you don’t have comments/users, there is little that needs to be maintained.

            It’s not perfect, but there will eventually be a point where YouTube becomes so enshitified that people begin to switch to alternatives.

            • @pathief@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              018 hours ago

              Nah, your ISP doesn’t give you enough bandwidth to host your own mini YouTube. You vastly underestimate the bandwidth required to run the service. It’s massive, which is why PeerTube is having a hard time gaining traction.

        • @where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          418 hours ago

          This, my friends, is a classic lemmy argument: “how about someone whom I already don’t pay anything go and do more work for less pay, so I can enjoy my content free, without ads, and don’t need to bother with an AdBlock”.

          How about, you, anon, set up a server, provide a simple upload API, and convince your favorite content creator to upload there? Since it’s no costs for them and very little work, they might. Maintain that for a year, then we’ll talk.

          • @figaro@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            015 hours ago

            Then realize that YouTube was losing billions every year for over a decade, and that their current model is the only way it can be profitable for them 😅

            • @where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 hours ago

              The unfortunate business model of the current tech world.

              And the only way to teach them to drop this BS is to migrate to a better thing as soon as the enshitification starts.

              I would’ve told you we shouldn’t have fallen into this trap to begin with, but that implies cooperation of the entire internet. And that ain’t happening.

              On the other hand, we can accept that this is how things are. We get years of free trial and pay for it in the next years. 13$/month is not an insane amount of money for the value provided. And it’s shared with creators in a transparent manner, so it’s not like they’re hording all of it either.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 hours ago

        If I had a million dollars I’d start a company that sets up and manages federated software like Mastodon and Peertube.

    • @Tregetour@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 day ago

      YT will likely attempt to play creators and viewers off one another. Similar to how hospitality does so with patrons and staff re: tips. You could see a FUD campaign aimed at anyone republishing their work on competitor sites.

    • @Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      odysee can also be a option from peertube as well but odysees privacy policy they sell non pii data according to them if they dont sell user data we will be good