• mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    From his lack of response on the topic it’s clear he still supports that position (being anti-gay marriage). He was ousted in part because Mozilla is supposed to be and open and inclusive place to work, hard to do that when your boss doesn’t believe you should be allowed to marry.

    Furthermore he proved his lack of morals and character by starting a crypto browser. This guy isn’t worth defending.

    Jobs fire people ALL THE TIME over personally held beliefs or things they say/do outside of work. We can argue that’s not right but as long as it happens to the rank and file I think it appropriate to at least try to hold C-level to the same standards. If it helps you sleep at night I’m almost sure he would have survived the backlash at any company that wasn’t like Mozilla, lord knows C-level came get away with murder most places.

    • AlecStewart1st@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He was ousted in part because Mozilla is supposed to be and open and inclusive place to work,

      So by “open and inclusive” that means “everyone has to have the personal opinions, even when they don’t bring any of those opinions to the company?”

      To clarify, I think gay people should be allowed to marry. I don’t agree with the supposed position Brendan Eich has. I say “supposed” because you haven’t provided any proof that this is his position.

      Here’s 2 great questions you should answer:

      1. Should Muslims be allowed to work at Mozilla?

      Islam is very anti-gay, and if you’ve met any Muslim immigrants, I have, they don’t think the gays should marry either. Among, uh, other things. Depending on age and where they’re from.

      1. Should you be penalized/reprimanded/fired by your employer for having opinions they don’t agree with?

      Let’s say this: you work for a Pakistani Muslim and in a workplace that’s predominantly Middle Eastern and North African. He doesn’t believe in gay marriage, you do. You donate like $50 to some LGBTQIA+ organization. Should your boss fire you?

      Or let’s be less controversial: you want to legalize all drugs and donate to a candidate who thinks the same. Your employer had a family member who died of a heroin overdose, and they’re pretty anti-drug. Should they fire you?

      Or lastly: you’re a Republican. Your boss is a registered Democrat. Neither of you talk politics at work and you get along well and you do your job. Should they fire you?

      hard to do that when your boss doesn’t believe you should be allowed to marry.

      Was Brendan Rich going out of his way to tell any gay people at Mozilla he thinks they shouldn’t marry? Was he bullying gay subordinates? If he was, yea, he should absolutely be fired. If not, it doesn’t make sense to me for an employer to fire you for personal opinions you hold that don’t effect your day-to-day job.

        • AlecStewart1st@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, I don’t disagree. But you can’t fire them simply because Islam isn’t pro-gay.

          But I need proof that Eich was going out of his way to specifically oppress the gays, not a “well obviously” or tangential claim. If he simply donated to some Republican who later turned out later to actually be anti-gay marriage, who’s to say Eich didn’t know they had that position?

          And we don’t even know if Eich is against gay marriage, no one here has shown proof of that. Should I assume you’re possibly Islamaphobic because of your comment? I don’t think I should.

          We can’t assume people’s positions based on nothing tangible. It comes off as obnoxious mind reading. In fairness, the internet created these mind reading games all political sides do, because it gets attention and likes. If someone truly holds a disagreeable opinion, you should be able to sufficiently counter it. Granted, that’s a whole different think when we’re talking about being in the workplace.

      • BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Believing in oppressing other people’s rights is not the same as actually taking an action to take those rights away.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Advocating those beliefs is! If he wasn’t doing that, no one would know about it

      • UmbrellAssassin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Look, a well thought out argument that really shows the hypocrisy of people now a days. Of course no one is going to respond.

    • d6GeZtyi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jobs fire people ALL THE TIME over personally held beliefs or things they say/do outside of work

      I thankfully (at least in my opinion) live in a country where this is illegal and it does seem well-enforced (I live in France). I understand this can and does happen in the US, but I still find it shocking enough for me to comment on it. The firing of Brendan Eich had a pretty big backlash so I’m not the only one.

      Furthermore he proved his lack of morals and character by starting a crypto browser. This guy isn’t worth defending.

      I do not use brave either because I’m not comfortable with the philosophy and whole crypto thing, but using that as a proof to “the lack of morals and character” of Brendan Eich is a big shortcut to take IMO. Ironically that quoted parts also sounds like something I normally would more likely hear from someone at the opposite side of the political spectrum - from what I guessed is your political affiliation - but I digress and my guess may be completely wrong (in any case, I don’t care much, I just thought it may help me to make you get my point).


      Then to make things clear, I’m not against boycotting companies due to the personal actions of someone you vehemently disagree with, I’m against the idea of insulting publicly both him and the projects he’s affiliated with every time his name comes up. This is the very annoying and toxic part.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Furthermore he proved his lack of morals and character by starting a crypto browser. This guy isn’t worth defending.

      I wish you had that level of moral integrity when it comes to working with companies that are banked by institutions that ravage and pillage the working class.