As this recently updated article discusses, while extremely unlikely, given the way this timeline is going it’s possible the electoral college ends in a tie. Nate Silver projects this as a .3% possibility.

Things to think about:

  1. Only about half of the states require their electors to vote for the person that won their state. Who are the electors? Generally no one you know.

  2. If there’s a tie, the House elects a president and the Senate elects a VP. Sub-consideration: it is the composition of the House and Senate after the November election that makes those determinations.

  3. This would all technically be decided on January 6th. And you remember how that went last time.

Regardless, it’s highly unlikely this will happen. Still, this would be utter and complete madness. There is literally a non-zero chance we have a Trump/Harris administration. 🤣

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Man, if only! Congress is dysfunctional now with 435 members.

      If we appointed them per 30,000 population, we would have 11,000 congressmen. 😳

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think its dysfunction has anything at all to do with having too many members. A significantly larger House may even end up being much less corrupt and more functional, at least after the growing pains.

      • Rivalarrival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think each comgresscritter should have a single vote in the house. 435 Congress people should be casting 335 million votes, one for each constituent they represent.