• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’ve gotta use something. There are only 3 choices, and one of those has less than 3% market share. Of the two choices left, Mac is the better choice.

    • Allero
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If you issue laptops, market share should not be your consideration except for availability of programs and tech support.

      Linux has plenty of both, and the obvious advantage of being open source and transparent.

      Btw, many governments are currently transitioning to Linux for that very reason.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Schools are going to train kids on systems that they may encounter in the business world, and their chances of encountering a Linux DE are vanishingly small. Idk how many governments are transitioning to Linux, but the United States government wasn’t doing so when this US school issued laptops. I love Linux and use it on all my computers, but I’m realistic enough to understand why the school issued Mac or Windows.

        • Allero
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I see your point, thanks.

          On the other hand, who if not state could help Linux adoption? If such programs would become universal, students would train on Linux, and businesses would be compelled to adapt.

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Real question - WTF does market share have to do with this?

      No one running a program like this is gonna care about “market share”.

      Most are gonna be 'give me cheapest you got" even if that means buying HS students baby’s 1st computer from ‘Fissure Nice’ (because they aint gonna spend money that can go in their pocket for name brand shit)

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Schools exist to prepare students for their adult life, and the working world. They’re going to choose an operating system that the students are likely to encounter at their jobs, and elsewhere in their lives.

        Most are gonna be 'give me cheapest you got" even if that means buying HS students baby’s 1st computer from ‘Fissure Nice’ (because they aint gonna spend money that can go in their pocket for name brand shit)

        They gave them MacBooks, so I’m not sure how you are arriving at this conclusion. School administrators don’t get to pocket any school budget money that they don’t spend on students.