I think he will, but there might be a real primary challenge.

  • Rivalarrival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    By that argument, a con man’s victims are to blame for having been fooled.

    • ben_dover@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      true, but i think the comment aims more at “it doesn’t have to be this specific con man, they’d fall for other con men too just the same way”

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think the counterpoint is that it seems not that common for one and only one con man to milk this voting base. Trump seems to be special in that he has nearly a monopoly, where as others would probably be in stronger competition and stuck splitting the populace.

      • Rivalarrival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        My point is that anyone can be conned by the right con man. Our status as Trump opposers does not render us immune to malicious deceit.

        I don’t mean to excuse the trumpists entirely. I’m just pointing out that without Trump to focus them, they don’t become radicalized, and never become a problem.

        • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Trump voters are the victim of a con, but the con is bigger than Trump. Conservatism in general is a con that needs misinformation networks like talk radio, fox news, facebook groups, etc. Without having been steeped in that bullshit for 40+ years, Trump would never have succeeded. It’s the whole ecosystem that’s doing the radicalization, not just Trump.