• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was more referring to using a containership in the northern ice sea to launch a single wave of UAVs to destroy the Russian strategic bombers parked north of st petersburg. You know a one time strike option.

    Or use clandestine means to build Magura type drone boat in the Caspian sea and launch against a vessel. You know, even more asymmetric. Like what they do in Syria and Africa.

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      northern ice sea…north of st petersburg.

      The Baltic Sea?

        • tal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ah, okay, gotcha.

          So, there are a couple issues:

          • I’d guess that Russia is able to prevent a surface ship from approaching Russia in any ocean unless someone can fight an offensive air and naval war to get control of that ocean.

          • I’m guessing (you said “container ship”) that the idea might be to use a concealed civilian vessel that then unloads some kind of surprise attack. While disguised military ships have been used to conduct armed warfare before, the last time I can think of an example was British Q-ships in World War I; I’m not sure that this is still legal.

          • Turkey has closed the Turkish Straits to warships due to the conflict, so technically no warships are supposed to pass, from either side. I’m I believe that it violates the convention governing this to either tell Turkey that the warship isn’t actually a warship or if Turkey knows but preferentially lets warships through. That being said, I guess theoretically Ukraine could assemble such an attack using a ship somewhere far away from Ukraine.

          • My guess is that if Ukraine had a lot of long-range cruise missiles, they’d probably be using them in their own theater of operations, as they’re pretty short on them.

          • I don’t think that Russia is using strategic bombers for the glide bombing attacks, so whatever the benefits of hitting them, I’m not sure that it would be a counter to the glide bomb attacks. kagis Yeah, this has the (much more numerous) Su-34 being used:

            On or just before Thursday, an air force Sukhoi Su-34 fighter-bomber lobbed a single FAB-3000 bomb with pop-out wings and satellite guidance at a multi-story building Russian intelligence had identified as a staging base for Ukrainian troops in Lyptsi, 10 miles north of Kharkiv in northern Ukraine.

          • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Strategic bombers are used to launch the hypersonics at Ukraine. They are rarer so a high value target. If they can cut of kinzal at its roots.

            • tal
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s true, though IIRC there are two planes, and I think that one of them – and the more-numerous one – is a variant of some multirole fighter.

              kagis

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh-47M2_Kinzhal

              Launch platform

              • MiG-31BM/K
              • Tu-22M3M
              • Su-34 (reportedly)
              • Su‐57 (planned)

              Looks like two confirmed, another possible, another eventually (though I can’t imagine using the rare, intended-for-another-purposes Su-57 if they could use the others).