I feel like other streaming platforms will follow the same process as they’ve proven it’s worked.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely they are. Didn’t say they can’t be.

        What they can’t do however is think that they’re entitled to use the service in ways that are against the terms of service.

        • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Company decides to change the deal and terms of service to require nudes and accompanying driver’s licenses photos every 21 days in this wild hypothetical

          Whirlybird: Why do people think they’re entitled to use a private company’s service nude-free while still paying? It’s in the ToS!

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whirlybird: unsubscribe if the terms of service are not to your liking

            rikonium: no I demand the other terms of service! Netflix is a human right!