I feel like other streaming platforms will follow the same process as they’ve proven it’s worked.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely they are. Didn’t say they can’t be.

    What they can’t do however is think that they’re entitled to use the service in ways that are against the terms of service.

    • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Company decides to change the deal and terms of service to require nudes and accompanying driver’s licenses photos every 21 days in this wild hypothetical

      Whirlybird: Why do people think they’re entitled to use a private company’s service nude-free while still paying? It’s in the ToS!

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whirlybird: unsubscribe if the terms of service are not to your liking

        rikonium: no I demand the other terms of service! Netflix is a human right!