Women have two niches in life: looking beautiful and making babies

The first niche will be taken by sexbots

The second by artificial wombs

Society will suddenly realize it doesn’t need women and those in power will quickly start replacing and disempowering them.

People like to consider the positive implications of technology but they don’t like to consider the negative implications

The smart strategy for women would be to ban ALL of the following:

  • sexbots
  • artificial wombs
  • trans women

Nobody except women should be allowed to look sexy(feminine sexy), look female or bear children.

To some extent TERF women like @jk_rowling are smart enough to realize that it’s essential to defend the female monopoly on this stuff. But the average woman just isn’t strategic enough to go along with this, and there’s (as always) a collective action problem so you get defectors.

  • Pfeffy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    This was incredibly optimistic and naive. Many if not most women are obsessed with having children. I’ve had three of my long-term relationships and because I have no interest in having children, Ditto for many of my buddies. Most women aren’t having children because men force them to.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        lol at the guy going ‘well achtually women do like being brood mares, and that is why I the stud, and my stud friends, have to break up with them, the brood mares demand our sperm it is too much! Where is my fainting couch!’ In reaction to you posting a quote from Valerie Solanas of all people.

      • Pfeffy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sounds like the kind of thing somebody would say when they know that I’m right and hate the fact. I’m guessing you went and looked up statistics?

        • deborah@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh, but you’ve provided us with statistics! Please, though, for the peer reviewers: we need the baseline measurement. How many women do you date who don’t break up with you? And are they all in Canada?

        • o7___o7@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Which is more likely:

          • You believe that half the human race lacks the agency and interiority that you theoretically enjoy
            OR

          • You desperately crave human interaction and will take any attention that comes your way, even if it’s negative

            That’s no way to live, is it? Do better.

        • blakestacey@awful.systemsM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          Spoken like a man who jerks it to tradwife Midjourney pics. Can’t get it up unless the fingers look wrong, can you?

    • self@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      this is the type of incredibly divorced energy that doesn’t play particularly well outside of twitter

      since you seem like someone’s bad takes alt and your response to @gnomicutterance@awful.systems was low-effort debatebro shit and then crickets: I’m afraid our instance is breaking up with you. please run and tell your buddies it had nothing to do with your personality; clearly the fediverse just wants your babies.