• @qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      3524 days ago

      That’s an unfair characterization.

      It’s not just the things they don’t like that can’t happen…it’s also the things they do like that must happen! See, for instance, prayer in school. (Separation of Church and State only applies to satanic stuff or something, idk…)

  • PirateJesus
    link
    English
    824 days ago

    Bottom Right sees freedom as not being told by other rulers what to do. Your own rulers get to tell you what to do obviously.

  • @goddard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -4
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I don’t think people that made this post know that some MAGA people are actually gay.

  • @notaviking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -824 days ago

    You aren’t free to do anything unless we live in the wild. Society is built on the premise that we work together and place restrictions on certain things where we can live in harmony. But it is an ever evolving set of rules, and just because the law says so does not make it just, slavery was a law, apartheid was a law, the purge in a fictional America is a law. So I believe we must constantly evolve our laws with reason, to allow as much freedom in society even at an individual level, where society can grow and lead to the most benefit for the majority of people

    • @rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      724 days ago

      society can grow and lead to the most benefit for the majority of people

      It’s a bit more complicated in real life. Who decides who gets freedom, some religious fundamentalists or rich oligarchs? Also, does that mean we should allow human sacrifices in the name of reproduction?

      • @notaviking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        424 days ago

        Yeah it is a hard question, like can be argued that there are too many people for the society and they need to be purged. Yeah I do not have a good answer but I think my point is rather that freedom isn’t freedom, just agreed confines in society that is ever evolving, that in my opinion should be based in reason, and it is society’s duty to use the correct reasoning.

        Like you mention allowing human sacrifices in the name of reproduction. The question is a bit loaded but reasoning can be used, what is human sacrifices? We do allow the death of certain individuals in certain societies, soldiers in war, criminals in execution, children that do not have access to resources like, shelter, food or medication. Can smoking and drinking be seen as a violation of life, since it slowly takes it away, what about unhealthy food or even drugs, does any vices like gambling or sex seen could be threatening to the quality of life. You see how life actually is valuable to a certain degree in society but then there is also a freedom to throw it away. There are reproductive rights, should everyone have a right to have children? What if this person is 7 years old? What if this person already had all their children taken away due to incest and molestation on multiple occasions. Can you abort whenever like at 8 months or 1 week or is it when two gametes form an embryo. What if it is a non-viable embryo, what if this embryo implanted itself in a place outside of a womb and abortion in this instance will save the mothers reproductive organs to have future successful pregnancies.

        There are very few things that are black and white in this life, very very few, so I believe there should be an ongoing discussion and that laws should follow reason and compassion for the vulnerable, that laws must constantly change, especially the laws, decrees, holy texts that invested people say should never change no matter the reason

    • @BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      523 days ago

      You aren’t free to do anything unless we live in the wild.

      I think that would solve a lot of the problems if that was still something you could do. I think a lot of people yearn to live in the ‘wild’ without realizing all the downsides that come with that and I think that thought is more popular because that’s just not an option in today’s world. And, I mean like the real wild, no laws, no government, etc.

  • @bi_tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -3424 days ago

    kinda insulting, which transwoman would wear a beard om purpose?

    also, got any tips for removing beard shadow?

    • нердовіч
      link
      fedilink
      4424 days ago

      It might not necessarily depict a trans woman, and rather a man in drag - who are also targeted by right-wingers

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        3924 days ago

        Or an enbie, or even just a cis man who likes long hair and the colour pink. You know that would set off the bigots.

        • Instigate
          link
          fedilink
          1624 days ago

          Or a Sikh trans woman. Or a cis woman with very active facial hair follicles. I mean, it could be so many different people.

        • VindictiveJudge
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          924 days ago

          Seriously, I live in Oregon. We’ve got lots of men with long hair, beards, and pink shirts.

    • @erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      1224 days ago

      My fiancée, for one. My close friend as well. Not every trans person feels dysphoria the same, or even at all. Don’t presume to know other people’s journeys or preferences, we’re all different.

    • TheHarpyEagle
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      To add to this, there are some cis women who grow facial hair (usually because of PCOS) and just rock it.