• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The other guy, the one with 34 felonies, has said he’d help expand the genocide.

    How do you miss these things?

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      How do you so constantly and completely deflect any and all criticism to the other guy?

      I have the answer: because that’s how the two party system works to push you towards defending the genocide guy.

      Like, you get that the genocide support has a good chance of making him lose to the somehow-worse-genocide-guy, right? Like why aren’t you mad about that? Why do you constantly have to tell everyone to stop talking about the genocide support? You realise that’s a kind of genocide denial, right?

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There are exactly two options here. It’s either the life long politician that’s actually been walking back support of the genocide, or the conman convict that has proudly stated he would be happy to make the shit even worse.

        Gee, I don’t know…

        I’m also not a one issue voter.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          There are exactly two options with voting. I assume you don’t see any others because your entire political imagination has been contracted to voting. I believe I anticipated your answer when I said that the two-party system has done this to your brain.

          And “walking back” support of the genocide is one way to say that he hasn’t actually removed any of the material support, and also a way to obscure the fact that the “walking back” has mostly been lip service.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Nobody.

              Two questions:

              1. Do you think I am somehow saying people shouldn’t vote for Biden? If so, can you explain where I have said that?

              2. Do you think the fact that Biden is the tactically superior choice means that we should not discuss that he is complicit in genocide?

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago
                1. Yes. Because that is the talking point for everyone that is obsessed with him sending arms to Israel.

                2. See response one.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago
                  1. You’re begging the question.

                  2. So your focus on winning Biden the election necessitates genocide denial.
                    Not a denial that the genocide is happening, but a denial of holding the perpetrators accountable.

                  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    You’re a broken record. Yes, we all know Biden and the American governments stance on Israel. You’re not helping anyone repeating the same tired argument over and over and over and over. No one is denying anything. Wtf.