• BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 months ago

    They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children… but how many children have they actually saved from this?

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 months ago

      They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children

      Sometimes it’s the terrorists.

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        But… Are they then going to catch or protect all the terrorist children?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s so that children wouldn’t get recruited by terrorists.

        Extrapolating a bit, children here may symbolize the civilian casualties of that world order becoming a bit more open, and terrorists those of us who don’t agree.

        See, I can do this without alcohol.

    • Beaver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re probably gonna put parents behind bars for a misunderstanding on their private lives

      • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        7 months ago

        This reminds me of that time google was scanning photos and reported a man to the police for being a pedophile, turns out it was a father sending a picture to his doctor