• marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    you haven’t really accomplished much other than hiding away all those intermediate versions in an invisible drawer

    What’s a huge improvement.

    And the alternative is what exactly? Using the Word’s internal version control? Yeah, right; good luck with that.

    • MacN'Cheezus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I suppose it can be helpful if seeing a folder full of revisions would otherwise drive you crazy. I mean, I fully admit I also sometimes just dump a mess from my desk into a drawer just so I don’t have to look at it constantly.

      Also, if you have a consistent habit of writing accurate and descriptive commit comments, you may not need to rely on being able to compare line-by-line diffs to see what’s changed between versions.

      I think the moral of the story is that git is a somewhat suboptimal tool for this purpose and it whether it’s helpful at all depends far more on your habits and discipline than on the functionality it provides.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        a somewhat suboptimal tool

        AKA the best we have around.

        If something appeared that handled opaque data better, it would take some thinking before creating the repository. Currently, there’s no reason to think at all.

        • MacN'Cheezus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Outside of being able to comment on each revision when making a commit, I guess I don’t see what benefit this provides that regular, automated backups (such as Time Machine) don’t.