• steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I was in Copenhagen earlier this year and the most striking thing about visiting was how many people there were with young kids pushing prams around. Would need to examine the statistics to see if this is actually true but I wonder if the fertility rate is higher due to a better social policies / financial support for families.

    Edit: Have just looked at the rates on the wikipedia demography page for each country. It’s higher in the UK 1.61 vs 1.55. Maybe the visible difference is due the amount of maternity/paternity leave being offered by employers.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Strollers used to be these cheap little things. Now they’re like SUVs. Where are you located where they don’t use strollers?

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            So like 40 years sgo, in the US, strollers were just these cheap little things, collapsible plastic frames with some heavy fabric to sit the kid in. The new ones are all super big and fancy and have whatever safety features. I would have guessed in areas where the newer kind are not available, they would at least use the older style of stroller. (As they would be less expensive, more portable, easier to produce, less footprint on the street/sidewalk.)

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Prams can be quite expensive, like £1000 for some models in the UK. I think cheaper models can be 10-15% of that price though and they are pretty essential for having young kids.

        Presumably the social security in a Scandinavian country would be enough to let any parent buy one. Probably the same in the UK although our benefits system is much more stringent.

  • FiniteBanjo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I know there is absolutely tons of historic evidence of viking pillagers, but I do want to point out that, with that evidence aside for just a moment, most or all of what is written about them in historic texts was written by the people who wiped out almost their entire culture and replaced it with christian theocratic monarchy.

    They get a bad rap.

    • Zloubida@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nobody wiped their culture. Their culture evolved, and other cultures influenced this evolution, as they influenced the culture of their neighbors.

      • FiniteBanjo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Oh lol, okay, tell me about the phonology of norn and younger futhark used in the age of vikings? How about any self-description of iron-age viking society before 1066, anything at all? Who were their leaders, how were rights allotted? Nothing remains but their versions of catholic prayers and before that their versions of oral germanic traditions like norse mythology, which was much more widespread.

        Basically, we know nothing about them that they told us themselves, in fact their systems of writing have only been properly compiled in the last century but the language is still entirely extinct.

        Because of Crusades. Because of Catholic Crusades on Vikings.