• TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is the only argument against lab-grown meat that it disrupts an existing industry? Because I’ve yet to hear a legitimate reason why this is a bad idea.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think it’s a reason to not go ahead with it either but then again it’s not too far off from the similar argument about replacing actors/knowledge workers with AI or factory workers/truck drivers with automation. It is true that while it may provide better and even cheaper product it does also come with a loss of work for ton of people.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      7 months ago

      The same people losing their minds over GMO crops are embracing labgrown meat. Why would you trust this? It’s the ultimate processed food.

      • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Instead of useless hostile replies, people should have just informed you that you’re likely confusing plant-based meat alternatives like impossible Burger with lab grown meat. Lab grown meat is still meat and it’s not processed from a bunch of ingredients it’s grown, just not on an animal. I’m sorry lemmy is so toxic. People should be allowed to not know everything, I think.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think you’re allowed to “not know everything” in most places. Usually, the issue comes when you make a factually-incorrect or demonstrably-false statement with no explanation to back it up. I typically only see downvotes when a comment is made with undeserved confidence and/or exudes a sense of arrogance.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    7 months ago

    they say bipartisan but the only democrat I see mentioned is fetterman. which does make me wonder about him more.

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’ll be competition with existing agricultural businesses. If you’re a rancher, you don’t want disruptive technology coming along and disrupting you out of business.

      As things stand today – and this has not been a constant over time, as their positions used to be reversed – the Republicans are the “rural” party, and the Democrats the “urban” party, so special interests involved with farming are gonna generally find a voice with the Republican Party.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        So this issue is boiling down to a luddite-esque type of situation. Except this time it’s the rich business owners getting pissed instead of poor textile workers.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well sure, that’s probably the real reason… But with how moustache-twirlingly evil these fuckers seem to delight in being these days, can you say for certain it’s the only reason? 🧐

        • tal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          probably the real reason

          That reason might be pretty significant as regards these laws, like the Florida one, holding up in court in that states have some constraints on what they can do to create protectionist laws that disrupt interstate trade.

          Like, if you’re a big beef-producing state, the beef producers can’t say “okay, we’re gonna block out-of-state competition and keep our state as a protected market against beef producers who operate in more-urban areas”.

          I commented the other day on the potential of a Dormant Commerce Clause case challenging them.

          • voracitude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Oh, I was just being facetious for a laugh. I know these sorts of decisions are just functionally evil driven by financial motivations, rather than outright intentional malice for the sake of it.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Reduces profits, so of course they hate it. Every doomed industry rushes to turn their products into the front line of a reactionary culture war.

  • tryitout@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “It doesn’t even make sense to me why someone would want to eat that,” Balsick said. “For us as humans to think that we can make a product better than God can is interesting.”

    Vs

    Are nuggets made with lab-grown chicken a more questionable choice than, say, milk from a cow that’s been fed ground-up chicken waste, a common practice which experts say may be contributing to the spread of bird flu?

    • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      “For us as humans to think that we can make a product better than God can is interesting.”

      And yet I bet this doorknob still eats bread, a product much better than the raw grain God provided us.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        All of us can do LOTS of things better than god. For starters, we’re visible. When someone asks us a question, we respond - and often in a clear, simple, unambiguous way, too. We can demonstrate our effect on the physical world. The list goes on.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I guess we’ll also ignore how different the animals we raise now are from what they were originally.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Journalists should know better than to conflate party names with liberal/conservative. Fetterman is a Democrat but he’s conservative.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, the guy who was first to endorse Bernie in 2016, the guy who talked about M4A and all the progressive talking points… he’s a real conservative.

      He’s an opportunistic guy, sure. I don’t think we can say what he actually believes.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    There are many interesting questions surrounding cultured meat, but I’m mostly concerned with two of them.

    1. Is it any good?

    2. Is it reasonably priced?

    There are lots of thought provoking discussions to be had, and I’ll be happy to read them, but the practical issues that impact me directly are the ones I care most about.

  • mr_robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    According to Nature, the products begin with a small sample of animal cells, typically muscle cells, which are cultured in a controlled environment like a bioreactor. Provided with nutrients and a scaffold for support, these cells multiply and differentiate into muscle tissue over the course of several weeks.

    Anyone know what the scaffold is made out of? The nature article is paywalled.