Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post, thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
This sneer sponsored by me getting surgery last Friday and being extremely sore
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/bkr9BozFuh7ytiwbK/my-hour-of-memoryless-lucidity
Surgery is the perfect opportunity to test oneās āAm I in the matrix?ā mental sigils and other fun rationalist mind games!
Of course someone made a follow up post encouraging readers to experiment with dangerously large drug dosages for giggles.
Little mention that this might be a terrible idea, but at least someone pointed it out in the comments
Lesswrong and drug abuse. A match made in heaven.
Jesus, that second post.
Yeah, because no widely used drug has ever turned out to be harmful, right?! Right?! Now if youāll excuse me, Iām off to huff some glue. After all, glue huffing is widely practiced recreationally - by kids, even - so itās probably safe, right?
Apparently JBP might still be on benzos, after he tried the russian coma method (which seems to have blasted his mind further, he was already weird before, but now he just seems even dumber). So GG there LW.
itās a known issue https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kindling_(sedativeāhypnotic_withdrawal)
deleted by creator
Eh, just ask ChatGPT.
thatās a very carefully worded comment. thereās a reason why benzos were commonly prescribed in the past (but less so now)
it sounds like what theyāre trying to do is Wada test, for no particular reason, with zero knowledge what theyāre trying to do or what tools do they need for that
about everything what could they learn from that is already described in psychiatry and psychology textbooks, but itās too hard for homeschooled first-principlers like them
Nothing illustrates the difference between rational and Rationalist than ignoring the advice of trained professionals and instead roping in a SO to help perform ad-hoc personality tests. Dudeās gonna need to work to keep that girlfriend coz itās unlikely heās going to find someone else willing to put up with his shit.
this is peak 18-century science
Inorite! āHere, let me replace my blood with blood from a horse, it should make me strongerā
we have mkultra at home
on the other hand, thatās just speedrunning being jordan peterson
on the third hand, our very good friend apparently never had been drunk
on the fourth hand, our very good friend also didnāt clock that maybe his ability to assess his own mental state was disturbed (it was) (severely)
on the fifth hand, this is an effect of many drugs, iv line suggests midazolam but maybe ketamine was an option. neither are exactly easily available for regular civilian (other benzos are)
first principling that benzos are completely safe, yeah way to go, 10/10. also not their first rodeo, but lwers on drugs would be megaminds on adderal, at least thatās what could be noticed previously
Whatā¦
Makes you wonder if LW just attracts people with weird paranoid thoughts, or that you get more weird paranoid thoughts due to being a lot on lesswrong. Right
This is another example of how LW is a cult, if some other commenter had replied like this youād expect the reply to be ignored but the respondent is of the same tribe, so author has no problem exposing them (and himself, by extension) as cranks to an appreciative audience (us).