• @SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -12 months ago

    No…no it does not…how are you even able to say that as a fact lol. Ukraine has lost around 31k soldiers since the invasion. Mississippi does not have 15k+ gun deaths a year.

    • @Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      Military losses are not part of the civilian gun deaths. Ukraine lost only 10k civilians over two years. That’s 133 deaths per 1m. Mississippi is more dangerous than an active war zone, that’s a fact.

      • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        Saying Ukraine during an active war which already had lower civilian gun deaths than the usa and then saying “no that’s not what I meant” is hilarious. It’s like if Germany or Poland were invaded and you said the same thing. You’re post is pointless.

          • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            02 months ago

            Ukraine pre-war already had a lower firearm homicide rate than the US…on top of that, they armed a huge portion of their population when they were invaded…so your point is even worse since they gave out literal assault rifles to civilians and their firearm homicide rate was still lower… sounds like its not the guns.

              • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                02 months ago

                Lol yea safer and they handed out rifles to civilians…so what is it? Is it the guns still or not? Because last I checked militaries fight each other with real guns, not nerf.