• @Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    32 months ago

    Mississippi has three times more gun deaths per capita than Ukraine during an active war. Your argument is 100% invalid.

    • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -12 months ago

      No…no it does not…how are you even able to say that as a fact lol. Ukraine has lost around 31k soldiers since the invasion. Mississippi does not have 15k+ gun deaths a year.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Military losses are not part of the civilian gun deaths. Ukraine lost only 10k civilians over two years. That’s 133 deaths per 1m. Mississippi is more dangerous than an active war zone, that’s a fact.

        • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          02 months ago

          Saying Ukraine during an active war which already had lower civilian gun deaths than the usa and then saying “no that’s not what I meant” is hilarious. It’s like if Germany or Poland were invaded and you said the same thing. You’re post is pointless.

            • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              02 months ago

              Ukraine pre-war already had a lower firearm homicide rate than the US…on top of that, they armed a huge portion of their population when they were invaded…so your point is even worse since they gave out literal assault rifles to civilians and their firearm homicide rate was still lower… sounds like its not the guns.

                • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 months ago

                  Lol yea safer and they handed out rifles to civilians…so what is it? Is it the guns still or not? Because last I checked militaries fight each other with real guns, not nerf.