• FiniteBanjo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would need a study on if this would negatively impact desert ecosystems or introduce invasive species, but otherwise it sounds pretty cool if we limit the size until it’s about as big as the new Panama Canal expansions.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nevermind any communities you’d separate or destroy by dropping a big ol’ river through the middle of them

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Americans don’t mind building highways, so it is not a concern to them.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Higheys through communities are good, then waterways are good too

      • FiniteBanjo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not like the number of communities measuring a hundred miles wide are many. Also, believe it or not, the USA has bridge building technology. Shocking, I know.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Luckily this entire swath of land is completely void of human and animal life and nobody will be emminent-domained out of their homes and livelihoods with little to no reward for doing so, and bridges are notoriously so much more permeable than plain flat land. I’m such a silly goose to not have thought of those things when I wrote that very serious comment about this very serious hypothetical 🥸

          • FiniteBanjo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            Do you lack reading comprehension? I said we should make it smaller than the image, idiot.

              • FiniteBanjo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m the most honest person you’ll never meet.

                • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  No, they aren’t. One is realistic, the other isn’t. I’m not going to debate which is which.

                  • FiniteBanjo
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    We accept your resignation from the argument.

              • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                That would cause the world to freeze, I saw that documentary “snowpiecer” they built a high speed rail and it froze the world.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Would need Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory to exist first for that to happen. After all, Snowpiercer is a sequel to The Great Glass Elevator. Charlie just changed his name.

                • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Says the guy seriously considering building a canal across the U.S. .

                  I wouldn’t tell anyone they’re a troll if I were you.

                  • FiniteBanjo
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Alright, I’ll take you seriously, the fuel efficiency per weight is far superior over water and vastly superior per volume. Sorry if I’ve been a little short with people in this thread, but it’s hard to take any of you seriously after that first guy suggested the canal would somehow displace millions of people as if it absolutely had to be routed in a perfectly straight line through major population centers. I wonder if the disconnect is that the European Mind cannot comprehend vast swaths of unprotected land being underutilized in the USA.