A sex offender convicted of making more than 1,000 indecent images of children has been banned from using any “AI creating tools” for the next five years in the first known case of its kind.

Anthony Dover, 48, was ordered by a UK court “not to use, visit or access” artificial intelligence generation tools without the prior permission of police as a condition of a sexual harm prevention order imposed in February.

The ban prohibits him from using tools such as text-to-image generators, which can make lifelike pictures based on a written command, and “nudifying” websites used to make explicit “deepfakes”.

Dover, who was given a community order and £200 fine, has also been explicitly ordered not to use Stable Diffusion software, which has reportedly been exploited by paedophiles to create hyper-realistic child sexual abuse material, according to records from a sentencing hearing at Poole magistrates court.

  • @Allero
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Current mental help methods for pedophiles include acceptance of their desires as normal, just not something to act on IRL.

    It does not prohibit any fictional materials including children, nor can it make someone uninterested in children.

    By stripping away safe outlets, we may come at risk of these people increasingly turning to real CSAM, which is way more harmful.

    • @Doof@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      What do you know of the current methods. Where did this information come from? I’d really like to see it. You spoke with such knowledge, you must have the data to make it up, right?

      • @Allero
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        The approach was originally pioneered by the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld, and later adopted for a wider use in Germany, Europe and abroad.

        Studies have shown that this approach does work, which led to its widespread adoption and popularization.

        You can read details of the treatments coming out of this research here.

        Beware of the corporate greed and prepare good old Sci-hub to read sources in full text if you want to.

        • @WormFood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          i read three of the sources you provided (all of them, except the book), and the only thing you’ve said which is true is that the treatment ‘includes acceptance of their desires’ (though you have added the words ‘as normal’)

          the other two claims you’ve made, including ‘it does not prohibit any fictional materials including children’ and ‘by stripping away safe outlets we may come at risk of these people increasingly turning to real CSAM’ are your own inventions, and are not stated anywhere in the texts you have linked, in fact, they are directly refuted by both of them, because the actual prevention project recommends a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy and medication

          • @Allero
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I specifically addressed the “current methods” part of it, as questioned.

            The second point was beyond the scope of the sources I provided, except maybe the book, but the project is in line with this as well - it does not focus on the fictional materials and does not explicitly prohibit them. It doesn’t encourage the consumption of such materials, either, so the position can be best described as “neutral”. It does, however, strongly object real CSAM.

            The latter was answered in another thread - yes, you are right about this being my speculation, as the scientific community, for all I know, currently doesn’t have data to either prove or disprove this point. But that seems likely to me.

    • @CorvidCawder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that this is not true. I’d love to see sources.

      There was some research before the ongoing AI-panic, focusing on hentai instead. As it is as “harmless” as the AI-generated content.

      And I do recall that at the time there were voices in research making the point that the consumption of material did not have correlation with actually reducing the urges. So this seems highly unlikely.

      • @Allero
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Upon proper search, I agree I must have been too rushed in decisions as the topic of the influence of computer-generated or drawn CSAM on escalation in offending still seems to be a matter of speculations, with severe lack of sources on both sides (correct me if I’m wrong).

        Both sides draw from singular testimonials.

        Still, I will remove the notion on science. Thank you for issuing the correction.

        P.S. This paper does some job of evaluating both sides, although has its own strong bias not based on presented evidence. Still, it is useful to get some basic overview of the current state of affairs.

    • @Syn_Attck
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Current mental help methods for pedophiles include acceptance of their desires as normal, just not something to act on IRL.

      I am not aware of the research in this area although I have a minor psych background so that’s interesting and makes sense in hindsight. My understanding is that a large part of the compulsion is driven by guilt, shame, feelings of worthlessness, prior victimizations of themselves, etc. Essentially trying to gain a sense of power by taking it from those more vulnerable than them, like an abuser beating their spouse because someone at work put them down. So it makes sense to encourage a sense of power and lessen any sense of guilt and shame.

      On a side note, I can’t imagine having their name plastered everywhere does anything but trigger the compulsion to re-offend. Maybe when we advance more as a society, we can separate individuals into categories of has-offended and child-attracted, with the former being on a public danger list and the latter having frequent discreet visits by social workers and mandatory counselors, etc. To lessen the chance of offense and possibly start helping them before they get to the offense stage (those that were ever going to offend.)