• @tal
    link
    English
    17
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    My own impression was the opposite – I didn’t like OW at all, felt that it missed what made Fallout click, and enjoyed FO4 a fair bit. OW felt like a slog to me.

    • OW’s perk system is really boring, in my book. None of the perks change gameplay much, just tweak numbers slightly. Interesting perks that affect how you play is a big chunk of Fallout.

    • OW had pretty much everything you run into in a city. Outside of cities, you pretty much just ran to a waypoint and back. There was virtually nothing to stumble across – running into encounters that opens up new content is what makes me feel like I’m constantly discovering new things.

    • While in theory the game is open-world, there was little reason to backtrack in OW. I went through it pretty much in order; it played pretty linearly.

    • The weapons were pretty underwhelming to me. The weapons within a class all work pretty much the same way. You don’t have a whole lot of variety. The unique weapons one gets aren’t all that potent, and generally, any weapon you get will only be used for a short time before it becomes obsolete. The weapons just don’t have a major impact on play.

    All that being said, hey, maybe OW2 will be an improvement. There’s nothing there that’s somehow fundamental to the series.

    • @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      I liked it quite a lot but all of these criticisms are more than fair.

      I’d also like to add that while, in theory, it had multiple story branches in practice I’d find it hard to side with the Obvious Capitalist Baddies because they don’t practice disaster capitalism, or late stage capitalism, they practice idiot capitalism, which, sure, in the metaphorical sense has some value especially considering modern climate concerns but doesn’t leave a lot of room for even someone that wants to RP a ruthless greedbag.

      You don’t need to believe in even enlightened self-interest to see their path, besides the “betraying your savior” angle, is a slow suicide fighting over dwindling resources.

      It was especially disappointing because Obsidian made New Vegas. We know they can do a Mr House, or even a Caesar’s Legion, some baddies that at least have a good recruitment spiel to make you want to see their storyline if nothing else.

      But, also, maybe they just figured that so many people missed the point of Caesar and House, hit them over the head this go around? Time is becoming a factor.

      There was something crucial missing from Outer Worlds to make it a great game, and I really hope they find it for 2.

      • @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        I try to keep preaching, Outer Worlds and New Vegas were written by different people. Marketing pushed the connection because of the shared studio, but the actual creative teams didn’t have much overlap.

        Leonard Boyarsky wrote Outer Worlds, and if you look at his previous credits the structure for big choices makes more sense.

        It’s not a bad difference, but it is very different writing from New Vegas, and people going in expecting New Vegas are going to be disappointed.

        • @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Sure, but that’s why Tim Cain coming in is great news, because at the end of the day I think what a lot of people really want is New Vegas 2: IN SPAAACE.

          • @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Tim Cain isn’t “coming in”. The first Outer Worlds game was Tim Cain’s baby along with Boyarsky. It’s not a shock he’s working on the second one.

            Tim Cain didn’t work on New Vegas.

            The second game is likely going to diverge further away from New Vegas, not become more like it.

    • verysoft
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      It’ll be an instant improvement if they just put the damn crosshair in the middle of the screen.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        I don’t remember a crosshair being an issue, was it like not there or something and I didn’t realise?

        • verysoft
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It kept the lowered offset console crosshair (like Halo had) for the PC version, which is unplayable imo. There was an ini file you could edit to move it to the middle, but was funky with some weapons, so I had to quit.

          • MrScottyTay
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Ah I’ve never minded when games have slightly lower crosshairs. Probably due to the amount of halo I played as a kid. In fact on MCC on PC I was annoyed that it was centered by default haha

            • verysoft
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              I played loads of Halo too and even if I was to go on Xbox now and play, the crosshair wouldnt bug me, it works on controller, but when I use mouse and keyboard it needs to be in the middle of the screen.

            • @chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              I didn’t even know that was a thing and didn’t notice it in OW. Funny how something most people don’t notice is “unplayable” for others.

              • verysoft
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Its fine on controller, I played tons of Halo with it, but for mouse and keyboard it’s horrible. A really odd or lazy design decision for the PC version, my guess is they probably couldnt be bothered adjusting it, Xbox was their main market.