• Rivalarrival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Maverick gets about the same fuel economy as a Toyota Prius so no, it doesn’t.

    Not even close.

    Prius: 57mpg city, 56 Highway

    Maverick: 22mpg city, 29mpg highway

    Even the hybrid version comes up short:

    Maverick Hybrid: 42 mpg city, 33 mpg highway.

    It’s not. The number of doors is why the bed is small and the length is long, not CAFE standards.

    The Maverick’s 61 sq ft footprint in the light truck category requires a minimum 28 mpg combined rating to comply with CAFE standards for the 2024 model year.

    If it had the 52sq ft footprint of a 2-door ranger, it would need to have a minimum 34 mpg combined rating to comply with CAFE standards in 2024. It doesn’t meet this with its standard engine.

    Relative to the requirements on a vehicle the size of a 1990s Ranger, the Maverick needs either 6 mpg better economy, or an additional 9 sq ft of footprint to comply with CAFE standards.

    The rear axle in a pickup needs to be located close to the center of the bed to maintain proper handling. To get the wheelbase they need by lengthening the bed, they would need to add as much length behind the axle as they add in front of it, keeping the rear axle centered. A 2-door “compact” Maverick would end up longer than a 4-door “full size”.

    To get the wheelbase they need without making the overall length absurdly long, they needed to extend the cab.