Putin said in a Russian state television interview that fears of Russia fighting NATO members directly are “complete nonsense.” The ISW believes Putin’s reassurances are better interpreted as threats.
Putin said in a Russian state television interview that fears of Russia fighting NATO members directly are “complete nonsense.” The ISW believes Putin’s reassurances are better interpreted as threats.
I mean, I doubt that he’d move against NATO directly, but that’s got nothing to do with his statements. He spent years swearing up and down that he wasn’t going to attack Ukraine, too.
If he could get away with it one way or another, yeah, I think that he’d give it a try. I just doubt that he’s going to have a realistic opportunity.
Also, while it’s probably not ISW’s principal interest, Russia under Putin did start conducting assassinations on the soil of several NATO members, and I am not at all sure that Russia will refrain from that in the future.
You had the polonium and the attempted Novichok assassination in the UK. In the case of the attempted Skripal hit, I distinctly remember reading a quote from Mike Pompeo about how we had specifically warned Moscow to knock off the assassinations shortly before it went through. When that happened shortly afterwards, he said that everyone was pretty pissed off with Putin.
You had the attempted assassination of that Bulgarian arms dealer, Emilian Gebrev.
You had the assassination via shooting of Zelimkhan Khangoshvili in Germany.
You had – and the US did not release information on this at the time – an attempted assassination on US soil of Aleksandr Poteyev.
That’s stuff that was generally considered off limits during the Cold War. You do espionage, but you don’t do hits on each other’s soil. The CIA’s assessment in the mid-Cold War:
https://www.cia.gov/static/Soviet-Use-of-Assassination.pdf