His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • @MJKee9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think the implication in all personal freedom discussions is: freedom so long as it doesn’t unnecessarily harm others. You may have freedom of speech in America, but that doesn’t protect the right to falsely yell “fire” in a crowded theater.

      • @MJKee9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sure it does. Notice i said unreasonable harm. There is a clear distinction between refusing to take someone’s wedding photo and providing someone with life saving care.

        There are US Court cases that deal with this distinction.

        Edit: i originally said unnecessarily as opposed to unreasonably… But the point still stands