I’m not gonna engage with bad faith bait. That’s idiotic and we both know it.
That’s not bad faith at all. You legit said that it costs so little. So then that little cost should be easy to make up. So which is it? Does it cost little or cost a lot?
Well I guess they could have given up reporting on reality like most corporate media, but that was one of the primary advantages of not being a corporate owned propaganda machine.
I’m totally ok with a news org being biased if it’s private. But not if it’s a public taxpayer-funded news org. They’ve admitted to having a liberal-bias.
Having a liberal-bias while reporting liberal-skewed news is not “reality” like you say. If you want tax payer money, then be a fucking neutral reporting agency.
The very fact that so many liberals liked it, and are mad at the funding being removed, is because it was a liberal-skewed news org. lmao
I’m fine with them spending a year being neutral, then campaigning for the federal funding to resume.
That’s not bad faith at all. You legit said that it costs so little. So then that little cost should be easy to make up. So which is it? Does it cost little or cost a lot?
I’m totally ok with a news org being biased if it’s private. But not if it’s a public taxpayer-funded news org. They’ve admitted to having a liberal-bias.
Having a liberal-bias while reporting liberal-skewed news is not “reality” like you say. If you want tax payer money, then be a fucking neutral reporting agency.
The very fact that so many liberals liked it, and are mad at the funding being removed, is because it was a liberal-skewed news org. lmao
I’m fine with them spending a year being neutral, then campaigning for the federal funding to resume.