I’m admittedly yelling at cloud a bit here, but I like package managers just fine. I don’t want to have to have a plurality of software management tools. However, I also don’t want to be caught off guard in the future if applications I rely on begin releasing exclusively with flatpak.

I don’t develop distributed applications, but Im not understanding how it simplifies dependency management. Isn’t it just shifting the work into the app bundle? Stuff still has to be updated or replaced all the time, right?

Don’t maintainers have to release new bundles if they contain dependencies with vulnerabilities?

Is it because developers are often using dependencies that are ahead of release versions?

Also, how is it so much better than images for your applications on Docker Hub?

Never say never, I guess, but nothing about flatpak really appeals to my instincts. I really just want to know if it’s something I should adopt, or if I can continue to blissfully ignore.

  • sorter_plainview
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    doesn’t yay simplifies the AUR installation? Things have been pretty easy for me after I started using yay

    • paequ2
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      yay simplifies the AUR installation

      Simple to me means not having to install some random extra tool and just using pacman like normal. That’s why I grumble.

      • sorter_plainview
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Haa understood. In that perspective yes it is not simple. I would also be happy if pacman had better support for AUR.

        But I have a different perspective on this. I always look for the right or the best tool available to do something. So I’m not that hesitant to use another tool for AUR. I guess it’s a personal preference after all.