You’re wrongly interpreting the person you’re arguing with as saying something you disagree with.

But he admited he was being sarcastic in that part of this post. So in one post, he is sarcastic in the first part, not sarcastic in the last part. Is that really the way to do sarcasm?

So since he didn’t but the “/s”, which he admitted to, and was sarcastic in the first part, but not the second half, the is it so hard to understand that someone may not think he was being clear?

That doesn’t make me “not arguing in good faith,” It’s me misunderstanding because of the we worded things–which he admitted to.

I haven’t tried to “nail them to the wall” at all.

so I don’t understand why you are going on and on. Move on already.

In fact, it’s so obvious that people probably think it’s more likely that you’re trolling

Let’s fucking think about this: Would trolling really be me misunderstanding someones fucking sarcasm? Do you think that’s the definition of trolling?! come on…