Posting this because no one else seems to want to, and it’s a discussion worth having outside of drama or personal conflicts. I’m undecided and can see both sides, but it’s important to address.

Potential benefits of a limit:

  • Frequent posters hold significant influence and could, in theory, push misinformation or propaganda (though I haven’t seen evidence of this it’s a fair concern).
  • A community dominated by one or two voices might discourage new members from participating.
  • Encouraging quality over quantity could increase the value of individual posts.

Potential downsides of a limit:

  • Could reduce overall community engagement.
  • If set too low, it might discourage meaningful participation from well-intentioned members.
  • It could inadvertently encourage the (mis)use of alt accounts.

These are some pros/cons but certainly not all! I encourage more discussion below.

  • Donald J. Musk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Actually as @TheTechnician2@lemmy.world pointed out in his post:

    (Most important) Monk posted to /c/politics at most about three times per day. This is realistically the bare minimum amount you’d want as a cap on posts per day. You can go back and check this for yourself; the overwhelming majority of their posts were on communities they created and moderated. Checking the month of September, the exception I saw to this was September 8th, where they posted four. This rule would have done absolutely nothing to deter their propaganda campaign.

    And also, banning Monk did nothing to stop him. He’s still all over Lemmy posting whatever he wants to. As is his right. Not to mention how easy it is to create alts.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I actually meant a different user, not UniversalMonk. This whole meta post stemmed out of some minor unrelated localized drama, I didn’t name the user because it’s 100% irrelevant to this whole discussion except in the sense of having sparked it off in the first place.

      But also, UniveralMonk posted a lot more than 3 times. For anyone who’s an admin, the query if you’re interested is:

      Huge SQL Query
      WITH daily_post_counts AS (
        SELECT 
          DATE(p.published) as post_date,
          p.creator_id,
          per.actor_id as poster_actor_id,
          COUNT(*) as post_count,
          -- Rank posters within each day by their post count
          ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
            PARTITION BY DATE(p.published) 
            ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC
          ) as poster_rank
        FROM post p
        JOIN person per ON p.creator_id = per.id
        WHERE 
          -- Filter for the specific community
          p.community_id = (
            SELECT id 
            FROM community 
            WHERE actor_id = 'https://lemmy.world/c/politics'
          )
          -- Exclude deleted and removed posts
          AND NOT p.deleted 
          AND NOT p.removed
        GROUP BY 
          DATE(p.published),
          p.creator_id,
          per.actor_id
      )
      SELECT 
        post_date,
        poster_actor_id,
        post_count
      FROM daily_post_counts
      WHERE poster_rank <= 3
      ORDER BY 
        post_date DESC,
        post_count DESC;
      

      It’s actually a lot more interesting to look over than I thought it would be. It’s all pretty normal at the beginning, but then at the end of April, there starts to be a sprinkling of a multitude of pretty-bad-faith-IMO posters, all starting to be represented more or less at the same time. They all just kind of start up in a little sprinkling, and then at the beginning of July, that stops and it starts to be almost all either normal posters or return2ozma, and then in early August UniversalMonk shows up, and they’re both heavily featured from then on. They’re both competitive with the heaviest of the other posters, with UniversalMonk peaking I think at 17 posts in one day on October 8th. Then, in late October, UM gets banned, and it goes back completely to normal except for occasional bursts of single posters (Joker@sh.itjust.works being an example) popping up and doing super-heavy posting and then disppearing as they get banned.

      I also see at least one of the heavy productive-post posters, that people don’t tend to hate the posts of, dropping out of the rotation, when they used to be heavily featured. That to me is a really sad thing. I have no idea why, sometimes stuff happens, but to me it seems at least a little bit likely that they got driven away by the periodic floods of propaganda and nonsense infesting what was just a normal news community, which would be really sad if that’s how it happened.

      • Donald J. Musk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 minutes ago

        UniversalMonk peaking I think at 17 posts in one day on October 8th

        In one community though? Because that’s like 2 posts a day over an 8 hour day. Lots of posters post more than that even now, and they’re not called trolls. Look at how much Blaze posts and comments. lol

        And you, yourself sir, are on A LOT. Like how many posts and comments do you make a day?