I’m reading here:
As Starlink’s user base grows, the Iranian government is likely to intensify efforts to restrict satellite internet access.
How could they do so?
I’m reading here:
As Starlink’s user base grows, the Iranian government is likely to intensify efforts to restrict satellite internet access.
How could they do so?
You can make radio receivers pretty hard to find. I think that shortwave radios are an even better example, where they’ve been used by intelligence agencies for effective unidirectional communications:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_station
But yeah, agree with you that if you want to want to have a transmitter, then you’re out of luck. Can’t hide that.
considers
You might be able to run just the downlink over Starlink, if it had a purely-unidirectional mode (which it probably doesn’t today). Most consumer bandwidth use is asymmetric. Hiding the downlink is hard, but the uplink might be easier.
It would have unusual-from-a-traffic-analysis, unidirectional, non-sustained traffic, but because the bandwidth usage is less, easier to hide in other traffic using steganography. Certainly have different traffic properties, at any rate, than a traditional VPN.
Another issue is that the receiver has to be visible from the sky. There are substances which are not radio-transparent but are visible light transparent. I’m sure that someone has done this.
kagis
Ah. Someone doing exactly this.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/14blm4x/how_hide_starlink_dish_from_skyview_without/
Also, if the government really wants to find these, I suppose that they could probably go after them with something like high-resolution radar imaging from aircraft.