This question was inspired by a post on lemmy.zip about lowering the minimum age to purchase firearms in the US, and a lot of commeters brought up military service and training as a benchmark to normal civilians, and how if guns would be prevalent, then firearm training should be more common.

For reference, I live in the USA, where the minimum age to join the military is 18, but joining is, for the most part, optional. I also know some friends that have gone through the military, mostly for college benefits, and it has really messed them up. However, I have also met some friends from south korea, where I understand military service is mandatory before starting a more normal career. From what I’ve heard, military service was treated more as a trade school, because they were never deployed, in comparison to American troops.

I just wanted to know what the broader Lemmy community thought about mandatory military service is, especially from viewpoints outside the US.

  • tal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    The overwhelming majority of manpower requirements in any military operation are associated with support, not combat.

    I remember reading that in Iraq, something like 10% of military personnel actually saw combat.

    There’s a lot that has to happen along the haft of the spear to make the tip of the spear work.