• ouRKaoS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    2 days ago

    Isn’t the point of the congestion fee to relieve congestion? Each person that says “this fee is stupid & I’m not paying” is one less vehicle in the area.

    Sounds like a win.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That is indeed the goal, but there is still a PR battle to be had on the issue.

      To my knowledge this is the first time that congestion pricing has been implemented in North-America, and how people react to this will decide whether other North-American cities are willing to take the risk and do the same thing. Over the next couple of months there will likely be a lot of opinion pieces and articles that try to make you think that the congestion pricing is a failure and should be reversed.

      Edit: typo

      • Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I hope they don’t react the same way they did when roundabouts (rotaries/traffic circles) were introduced. Another thing that is only a problem in America and works well in many other countries.

        • effward@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Runabouts can be very awesome, but can anyone explain to me what the hell is going on in the UK where (in some places) they’ve added a bunch of traffic lights to their roundabouts? In my (admittedly limited) experience, they make them substantially worse, but perhaps I’m missing something?

          • Humanius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            From my understanding there are two main beneftis:

            • Capacity
            • Safety

            Roundabouts work great, until the amount of traffic becomes to big. Then it actually starts causing problems.
            At that point you can put in a regular intersection with traffic lights, which actually works better than a roundabout does in high traffic environments. But you do lose out on the traffic safety benefits, with head-on collisions becoming possible again.

            A roundabout with traffic lights increases the capacity of the intersection while still reducing the risk of deadly accidents.
            It’s also a lot cheaper than upgrading to the next step, which is building an interchange.

            Signalised roundabouts are also quite prevalent in the Netherlands, and I can speak from experience that they generally work quite well if the lights are adjusted properly.

            Note: I’m just some random guy, I’m by no means an expert on the matter.
            This is just my understanding of the benefits of lighted roundabouts.