We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

  • @goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2711 days ago

    and then you’d just replace them with one of the other three dozen you bought from Wal-Mart for five bucks back in 2016

      • @goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3211 days ago

        hey I’ll have you know I keep all my broken earbuds in the same box in the garage with all the other cables and assorted dongles I can no longer identify and will likely never use, like any responsible citizen should

      • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1911 days ago

        If you think Bluetooth earphones won’t also be in that pile once the batteries stop holding charge after 2 years, you’re in for a world of dissapointing sex

        • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 days ago

          My AirBudz are over five years old and still play for like five hours before I need to charge them… and I used them 40+ hours daily for all of those years.

        • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -411 days ago

          My point wasn’t wired vs wireless. It was disposable crap that breaks vs corporations not deliberately making crap the only thing most people can comfortably afford.

      • Lemminary
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1411 days ago

        I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch to be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed. Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

        • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1211 days ago

          I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch

          Cheap and disposable plastics and electronics IS a significant part of the world garbage problem and yes, plastic particles is MOST of the garbage patch specifically.

          be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed

          Whoa, dude, hold your horses! I’m in no way blaming consumers. Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

          Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

          Ok, admittedly a poor choice of example. Doesn’t invalidate my intended point though, however ill-stated heh

          • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 days ago

            This is tough -

            Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

            (US here) Gets me thinking about dollar store headphones. Consumers could buy decent headphones for about $10 direct from overseas. When that’s equivalent to more than an hour of wages, there’s still demand for the $1 version. Should this need not be met out of a sense of social responsibility?

            (I don’t have a perfect answer myself)

            Econ 101 on my mind here btw:

            • @Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 days ago

              The problem is that our economic system has encouraged an environment where reputation is a thing to be immediately cashed out. You can’t even know if those $10 earbuds are any better than the $1 version.

              • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                311 days ago

                You can make some reasonable assumptions although they will be imperfect:

                Wouldn’t be as frequently imperfect if freaking review fraud weren’t entirely ubiquitous (grrrr)

          • @Tankton@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            011 days ago

            When people talk about disposable plastic they don’t mean electronics like earbuds. They mean packaging, plastic bottles, plastic bags etc.

      • @marduk@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I’m here for the wired headphone -> pacific garbage patch vs lithium battery child labor -> wireless headphone fight 🍿

          • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 days ago

            I’d imagine the limited lifespan of their batteries and the fact that they have ones to begin with would be of bigger concern

            • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 days ago

              That’s fair. My first pair still works awesome after five years, and I’ve used them for 40+ hours a week for that whole time. I only have a new pair because I needed ANC, but I still use my old pair to sleep.

              • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                211 days ago

                I think the headphones I’m using are 20 year old. But to be fair, a lot of them either don’t last that long or are simply thrown away for some new thing.

          • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            011 days ago

            You might want to edit the comment since in the context it definitely sounds like saying wireless would be better

            • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -111 days ago

              Not really, no. I’m responding to a comment about cheap buds that break too easily, which isn’t exclusive to wired ones.

              There’s literally no mention of the wired vs wireless aspect in my comment or the one I’m replying to.

              • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                011 days ago

                My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired. That’s the context your post is in. And you’ve already had several people misunderstanding your intention because it is written in that context without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

                • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -311 days ago

                  My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired

                  Not my comment. I’m clearly commenting on a separate aspect. That others try to ascribe a nonexistent secondary meaning that I haven’t so much as hinted at isn’t my fault.

                  without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

                  I’m personally not a big fan of spelling out the obvious, but ok:

                  You’re wrong to assume that my comment follows the previous theme from pure proximity and it’s annoying to have to bend over backwards to facilitate the poor reading comprehension (if not bad faith) of people making up their minds about what I’m saying before reading it.

                  • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    111 days ago

                    I’m clearly commenting on a separate aspect

                    You seem to have been overestimated how clear that was.

                    That others try to ascribe a nonexistent secondary meaning that I haven’t so much as hinted at isn’t my fault

                    That’s just how context works.

                    You’re wrong to assume that my comment follows the previous theme from pure proximity and it’s annoying to have to bend over backwards to facilitate the poor reading comprehension (if not bad faith) of people making up their minds about what I’m saying before reading it.

                    Idk if you know how conversation work but people typically use and understand context. If you don’t mind people misunderstanding you, then no need to do anything. If you do mind it, it might be helpful to spell things out. But it’s up to you really, I don’t mind either way.