Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should’ve looked into posting this in a different community… It’s closer to a silly “innovation”… soo… is this considered FUD? I also don’t support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had “privacy-violating” before the “solution”.

  • @linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    416 days ago

    i dont see how this is a violation of anyones privacy and trying to get kids to not get addicted to drugs is a pretty fucking good cause.

    • @toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      416 days ago

      Assuming this is just a sensor for air quality tuned to this use case, I would probably have to agree. So long as it isn’t tracking specific students or taking photos, this is about as privacy invansize as the motion detector that opens automatic doors… or any old carbon monoxide or other detector which are used to legit protect public safety, just as preventing children from the claws of the tobacco industry.

    • @Allero
      link
      3
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Lemmy generally has a pro-drugs sentiment, which is certainly unsettling.

      Also, can I visit bathrooms and not get into clouds of vape smoke, pretty please?

      • @linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        216 days ago

        i mean im all for letting people approach drugs as they please but, someone smoking weed once in a while with some frinds is not the same as massive corporations flooding media as specifically media for children with propaganda to get them addicted to nicotine. Being pro that isnt so much being pro drug as its being a corporate bootlicker and downright irresponsible.