@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 27 days agoNo one’s ready for this: Our basic assumptions about photos capturing reality are about to go up in smoke.www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up1465arrow-down146cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgkintelligenz@feddit.orgcollapse@slrpnk.netphotography@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1419arrow-down1external-linkNo one’s ready for this: Our basic assumptions about photos capturing reality are about to go up in smoke.www.theverge.com@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 27 days agomessage-square175fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgkintelligenz@feddit.orgcollapse@slrpnk.netphotography@lemmy.ml
minus-square@WolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish2•26 days agoThere are some really subtle details experts can look at to detect Photoshop work, such as patterns in the JPEG artifacts than can indicate a photo was reocmpressed multiple times in some areas but not others.
minus-square@helenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-226 days agoThey can do the same with these. Only its a lot less subtle.
There are some really subtle details experts can look at to detect Photoshop work, such as patterns in the JPEG artifacts than can indicate a photo was reocmpressed multiple times in some areas but not others.
They can do the same with these. Only its a lot less subtle.