@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 27 days agoNo one’s ready for this: Our basic assumptions about photos capturing reality are about to go up in smoke.www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up1465arrow-down146cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgkintelligenz@feddit.orgcollapse@slrpnk.netphotography@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1419arrow-down1external-linkNo one’s ready for this: Our basic assumptions about photos capturing reality are about to go up in smoke.www.theverge.com@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 27 days agomessage-square175fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgkintelligenz@feddit.orgcollapse@slrpnk.netphotography@lemmy.ml
minus-square@helenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish3•26 days agoAccessibility makes it the opposite of convincing. And a skillfully modified photo is going to convince just about anyone.
minus-square@WolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish2•26 days agoThere are some really subtle details experts can look at to detect Photoshop work, such as patterns in the JPEG artifacts than can indicate a photo was reocmpressed multiple times in some areas but not others.
minus-square@helenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-226 days agoThey can do the same with these. Only its a lot less subtle.
Accessibility makes it the opposite of convincing.
And a skillfully modified photo is going to convince just about anyone.
There are some really subtle details experts can look at to detect Photoshop work, such as patterns in the JPEG artifacts than can indicate a photo was reocmpressed multiple times in some areas but not others.
They can do the same with these. Only its a lot less subtle.