India’s largest budget carrier, IndiGo, is the first airline to trial a feature that lets female passengers book seats next to other women to avoid sitting shoulder-to-shoulder with a man in a move designed to make flying more comfortable for female passengers, according to a CNBC report.

The airline’s booking process is fairly standard except for the seat map which highlights seats occupied by women with the color pink. This information is not visible to male passengers, according to the airline, CNBC reported. IndiGo did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch’s request for comment on the new feature.

  • Allero
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yeah that’s part of what I mean.

    Another part is that this proliferates the issue on both ends - aggressive men don’t learn to behave well as they don’t confront the situation and don’t learn self-control, and women turn more to fear and loathing, severing more and more contacts with men and alienating them, which ends up hurting men and limiting their exposure to women side of the story, making them more violent.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not the job of women to put themselves in potentially dangerous situations for the betterment of men. Women not wanting to be easily assaulted is “hurting men” is a disgusting take and says some truly awful things about you.

      • Allero
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        My take is exactly that the suggested approach might not improve women’s safety overall. The “betterment of men”, as you put it, is the key ingredient to a sustainable solution on male sexual harassment and violence, and segregation is a patch that can come with unintended consequences that will undermine this process and directly hurt women.

        We may not ignore the social and psychological consequences of such actions for men, as their mental wellbeing is directly related to the probability of committing assault, thereby again, directly affecting women.

        I’m trying to make a point to counter the immediate knee-jerk approach, and call to collect evidence on the efficacy of such measures to promote women’s safety. Any policy should be driven by what actually works, not what we feel of it.

        I urge you to stop assuming bad faith in everyone you disagree with, and to clarify first. Lemmy is very much a people-driven platform, and absolute majority of people here are well-intentioned. Thereby, if another person shares a different opinion, they probably come from a position of care as much as you do, they just have a different consideration in mind.