I trust that there are other posts which are presenting information closer to that which you are seeking. Perhaps you have a specific topic in mind, and perhaps you have done some research yourself, casual or serious.

It’s deeply disturbing and problematic.

What relationship do you wish to cultivate?

In order to detach your contribution from their behavior, or in order to attach your contribution to their behavior?

My coarse understanding is that decades ago the gratuity was originally before service, so that one could establish the quality of service they were requesting.

This can be achieved by what you intend and practice.

I’m deeply grateful for the consideration. This is all programmed in Rust, is it not?

Thank you.

Consider staying focused.

Technology is an instrument.

The artificial intelligence is the corporate and/or institutional entity, and it has been for decades if not for millennia.

Refuse/Resist.

Do you know if this is under the 2FA layer?

Because you have mental health and/or neurodivergent experiences, and you may not have been expecting any further interaction?

Thank you for your original bid, and for your response.

Luck is important.

Pseudoprofound? 🤭 It’s okay to not understand or care.

Good luck with your search/seeking.

(Yawns) Thanks. Did you read the community description? Comments are not part of my research.

Clearly you do not understand context.

Have you researched and educated yourself by now?

Are you able to combine deep trauma therapy , narrative therapy and active imagination into some semblance of context?

This is masterful, humane intricate therapy for perhaps some other individual, and perhaps not for you, or for those to which you extend understanding and compassion.

Are you a hobbyist in advanced trauma and autism therapy, or an amateur, or a professional, or an expert? Do you have substantial direct first or second-hand lived experience?

Are you an edge-compute ethnologist and researcher?

If I ask you to contribute a self-authored ten-page document detailing cutting edge research regarding biopsychosocio-spiritual assessment and communication, as it intersects with deep and chronic trauma experienced by those ‘on the autism spectrum’, are you a contributor, or are you a tourist?

Are you comfortable speaking from lived experience, with discernment, about your own mental health; diagnosed or undiagnosed?

Are you accurately informed, or accurately uninformed?

There’s no such thing as a stupid question. This doesn’t mean that I have the time, focus or energy to indulge in responding.

I understand that you are doing your best. Thank you for trying, and for having the courage to confront your own awareness.

If you’re paying attention, perhaps you have noticed that I am a deep trauma and autism spectrum specialist. As a researcher and ethnologist, the Way I talk with the individuals I appreciate is based on a constitutional agreement, codes of conduct, and time-tested protocols. Do I put up with your nonsense because deep trauma therapy did not make sense to you when you read it? Do I castigate, excoriate of block you because you couldn’t be bothered to understand what transpires, and have the common sense to realize that Praxis is an individual who appreciates the Way in which I approach his suffering and process of understanding?

Are you an ally here or a tourist here, Tar_Alcaran?

Do you even read what I have shared about trauma, therapy, narrative, synthesis, quantum computing and research developments in concepts of bioelectric ionic fields and quantum communication?

I haven’t asked you to be here, or to read what I share transparently.

Why are you here, and why is this comment the best you can offer in order to gain some semblance of diminished ignorance, or actual alignment and participation?

I hope that your comment was useful for you in some other arena, and that dropping it here and not picking it up is some useful service to you, instead of littering.

I don’t know you and I don’t judge you because I must be informed, and deliberate with wise informed peers, in order to negotiate sound judgement.

The big question is, how do you love?

Tell me more?

"“Infobesity” creatively describes “the function of consuming, without intentional control, a vast array of ultra-processed, commercially produced, and marginally nutritious information. Unchecked, our brains still digest it all using ‘stacked’ biases which are cognitively ‘smoothed over’ so we don’t see the immediate effect.” - Polymathic Being

We operate through biases - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Cognitive_bias_codex_en.svg

It’s part of our Operational System, and we are not trained to use these biases correctly, conducively, or in a healthy way. They are algorithm; a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer. They can be understood, designed and engineered.

Lacking informed judgment, informed consent, informed participation; lacking accuracy of what responsibly and accountably would be facts, and understanding of healthy effective prioritization and natural and logical consequences…and experiencing candid learning disorders… does lead to dysfunction, don’t you think?

Are we clear as we examine this occurrence that there are a series of steps which must be chosen, and a series of interdependent cogent actions which must be taken, in order to accomplish a multi-step task and produce objectives, interventions and goal achievement, even once?

While I am confident that there are abyssaly serious issues with Google and Alphabet; with their incorporated architecture and function, with their relationships, with their awareness, lack of awareness, ability to function, and inability to function aligned with healthy human considerations, ‘they’ are an entity, and a lifeless, perhaps zombie-like and/or ‘undead’ conclave/hive phenomenon created by human co-operation in teams to produce these natural and logical consequences by prioritization, resource delegation and lack of informed sound judgment.

Without actual, direct accountability, responsibility, conscience, morals, ethics, empathy, lived experience, comprehension; without uninsulated, direct, unbuffered accessibility, communication, openness and transparency, are ‘they’ not actually the existing, functioning agentic monstrosity that their products and services now conjure into ‘service’ and action through inanimate objects (and perhaps unhealthy fantasy/imagination), resource acquisition, and something akin to predation or consumption of domesticated, sensitized (or desensitized), uninformed consumer cathexis and catharsis?

It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick incorporation.

I apologize for taking so long to respond to you. Your comment didn’t show up in my notifications. This platform is quirky.

This could end up being a perspective or maybe a creed, perhaps. I have no interest in offering a ‘manifesto’. While I may often express myself solemnly, emphatically or formally, I’m far more likely to encourage and to invite others to share about their intentions, motives, or views than I am to declare mine. In Latin, “manifestus” means clear, conspicuous; obvious, and my own requirement to be transparent is simply the nature of things. I manifest through ethics, codes of conduct, protocols and constitutional agreements.

In Latin, “Manifesto” actually means “to make public.” Many things are made public. It’s hardly unusual or unseemly. Many publications are a written declaration of the intentions, motives, or views of the issuer, be it an individual, group, political party, or government, and a social media platform itself could be described more accurately than I as a supplier or distributor. Communications, like Meta/Facebook messages, are a written declaration of the intentions, motives, or views of the issuer, are they not?

I offer no prescriptive notions for carrying out changes because I am not in a position to offer any prescription to anyone I do not know and have a specific relationship with. Deliberation and sound judgment are prerequisites for prescriptions. What works for me, as a different species, has nothing to do with what works for you. I don’t know you, or really anyone else besides Tull, and we are each and all individuals. Your changes are yours to make and I have no understanding of how you or anyone else would go about effecting or affecting successful changes in life.

Calling an acquaintance to attend to a deliberation is hardly nonsense, or anything even out of the ordinary. Being gladly and willingly obliged to transparency does require being public, especially as a researcher. This requires me to attend to others’ situations with a different intent and interaction, and while this may seem odd or foreign to you, researchers do actually publish their work, their observations and their results. Often they publicize their methods and intents.

I’m far more likely to observe and to share findings than I am to offer or even to write a manifesto. I have so much else to take care of…

Block the sub, please. It’s fortunately not nonsense, and you don’t need to trouble yourself with trying to understand. Thank you for asking.

Alright. Thank you for mentioning this! I haven’t felt compelled to adopt one format over another, and honestly I prefer something similar to the calendars of the Mayans.

Would you like to say more, and offer a concept of why you are mentioning this, and why this is important to you? I’d like to understand what you’re offering.