Human visual processing is extremely low resolution. 8-bit, if I remember correctly. What you’re imagining has to do with imagination, not vision or sufficient comprehension for communication. This is a matter of competency and ability; generating an image, producing equivalent text, parsing, citing, don’t you think? Systems need to be image-generators, or text generators; image-interpreters, text interpreters… Perhaps examine the taxonomy of AI.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4244194/

Human communication is non-verbal; body-language, tone of voice, facial expression, eye contact and movement, gaze, presence. Why write, say anything, when one can show an image, point, or just look, knowing the Other is attentive, curious and interested in communication.

Thank you! The human cranial brain and its ability to function, to interact with and to affect the rest of the brain cells and systems distributed throughout the human body is apparently being ignored in favor of focusing on anything and everything else? Human brain augmentation happens naturally. It’s called “practice” and “experience”; proficiency, competence, flow, mastery… Learning in novel ways and environments.

Ionic fields already affect the various brain-cell clusters. There is no need to insert foreign objects.

I trust that there are other posts which are presenting information closer to that which you are seeking. Perhaps you have a specific topic in mind, and perhaps you have done some research yourself, casual or serious.

It’s deeply disturbing and problematic.

What relationship do you wish to cultivate?

In order to detach your contribution from their behavior, or in order to attach your contribution to their behavior?

My coarse understanding is that decades ago the gratuity was originally before service, so that one could establish the quality of service they were requesting.

This can be achieved by what you intend and practice.

I’m deeply grateful for the consideration. This is all programmed in Rust, is it not?

Thank you.

Consider staying focused.

Technology is an instrument.

The artificial intelligence is the corporate and/or institutional entity, and it has been for decades if not for millennia.

Refuse/Resist.

Do you know if this is under the 2FA layer?

Because you have mental health and/or neurodivergent experiences, and you may not have been expecting any further interaction?

Thank you for your original bid, and for your response.

Luck is important.

Pseudoprofound? 🤭 It’s okay to not understand or care.

Good luck with your search/seeking.

(Yawns) Thanks. Did you read the community description? Comments are not part of my research.

Clearly you do not understand context.

Have you researched and educated yourself by now?

Are you able to combine deep trauma therapy , narrative therapy and active imagination into some semblance of context?

This is masterful, humane intricate therapy for perhaps some other individual, and perhaps not for you, or for those to which you extend understanding and compassion.

Are you a hobbyist in advanced trauma and autism therapy, or an amateur, or a professional, or an expert? Do you have substantial direct first or second-hand lived experience?

Are you an edge-compute ethnologist and researcher?

If I ask you to contribute a self-authored ten-page document detailing cutting edge research regarding biopsychosocio-spiritual assessment and communication, as it intersects with deep and chronic trauma experienced by those ‘on the autism spectrum’, are you a contributor, or are you a tourist?

Are you comfortable speaking from lived experience, with discernment, about your own mental health; diagnosed or undiagnosed?

Are you accurately informed, or accurately uninformed?

There’s no such thing as a stupid question. This doesn’t mean that I have the time, focus or energy to indulge in responding.

I understand that you are doing your best. Thank you for trying, and for having the courage to confront your own awareness.

If you’re paying attention, perhaps you have noticed that I am a deep trauma and autism spectrum specialist. As a researcher and ethnologist, the Way I talk with the individuals I appreciate is based on a constitutional agreement, codes of conduct, and time-tested protocols. Do I put up with your nonsense because deep trauma therapy did not make sense to you when you read it? Do I castigate, excoriate of block you because you couldn’t be bothered to understand what transpires, and have the common sense to realize that Praxis is an individual who appreciates the Way in which I approach his suffering and process of understanding?

Are you an ally here or a tourist here, Tar_Alcaran?

Do you even read what I have shared about trauma, therapy, narrative, synthesis, quantum computing and research developments in concepts of bioelectric ionic fields and quantum communication?

I haven’t asked you to be here, or to read what I share transparently.

Why are you here, and why is this comment the best you can offer in order to gain some semblance of diminished ignorance, or actual alignment and participation?

I hope that your comment was useful for you in some other arena, and that dropping it here and not picking it up is some useful service to you, instead of littering.

I don’t know you and I don’t judge you because I must be informed, and deliberate with wise informed peers, in order to negotiate sound judgement.

The big question is, how do you love?

Tell me more?

"“Infobesity” creatively describes “the function of consuming, without intentional control, a vast array of ultra-processed, commercially produced, and marginally nutritious information. Unchecked, our brains still digest it all using ‘stacked’ biases which are cognitively ‘smoothed over’ so we don’t see the immediate effect.” - Polymathic Being

We operate through biases - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Cognitive_bias_codex_en.svg

It’s part of our Operational System, and we are not trained to use these biases correctly, conducively, or in a healthy way. They are algorithm; a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer. They can be understood, designed and engineered.

Lacking informed judgment, informed consent, informed participation; lacking accuracy of what responsibly and accountably would be facts, and understanding of healthy effective prioritization and natural and logical consequences…and experiencing candid learning disorders… does lead to dysfunction, don’t you think?

Are we clear as we examine this occurrence that there are a series of steps which must be chosen, and a series of interdependent cogent actions which must be taken, in order to accomplish a multi-step task and produce objectives, interventions and goal achievement, even once?

While I am confident that there are abyssaly serious issues with Google and Alphabet; with their incorporated architecture and function, with their relationships, with their awareness, lack of awareness, ability to function, and inability to function aligned with healthy human considerations, ‘they’ are an entity, and a lifeless, perhaps zombie-like and/or ‘undead’ conclave/hive phenomenon created by human co-operation in teams to produce these natural and logical consequences by prioritization, resource delegation and lack of informed sound judgment.

Without actual, direct accountability, responsibility, conscience, morals, ethics, empathy, lived experience, comprehension; without uninsulated, direct, unbuffered accessibility, communication, openness and transparency, are ‘they’ not actually the existing, functioning agentic monstrosity that their products and services now conjure into ‘service’ and action through inanimate objects (and perhaps unhealthy fantasy/imagination), resource acquisition, and something akin to predation or consumption of domesticated, sensitized (or desensitized), uninformed consumer cathexis and catharsis?

It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick incorporation.