• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle


  • teuniac_@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldDefenders of oatmeal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Leave 50g jumbo oats and 100ml soy milk and some cinnamon mixed in a closed container overnight in your fridge. Then in the morning add a splash of additional soy milk, other stuff*, and some honey.

    The other stuff I use (all at the same time):

    • pear/strawberries (depending on season)
    • walnuts
    • milled flaxseed
    • Brazil nuts
    • omega 3 seed mix (cheap and healthy)
    • dried cranberry (or raisins)
    • macadamia nuts

    You can also use a nut mix (without peanuts). I just don’t because I don’t tolerate hazelnut well.

    This breakfast is super useful because it includes so many nuts, which are recommended but quite tricky to include in one’s diet. And it adds a ton of fiber and a piece of fruit.








  • I’m vegan now, previously vegetarian. But before this I was in exactly the same position as you describe. It’s the first time that I’m actually hearing of someone who admits there can be an inconsistency between your own behaviour and your values.

    Depending on what it is, sticking to your values is hard and requires changing your behaviour and habits. Your environment matters a lot. For me it was easy to switch to a vegetarian diet because my partner loves experimenting with cooking and collecting recipes. For many it won’t be this simple.

    I used to think it would be easy for people generally to admit that it’s pretty unlikely that they’re sticking to all of their values, but apparently it’s not. I think it’s impressive how you’re managing not to let personal pride determine your opinion on this!




  • I never really understand why people find it so entertaining to make fun of vegetarians and vegans.

    Their choice results in less suffering, plain and simple. Maybe you aren’t willing to change your diet, that’s your decision. But if others are willing to put effort into changing their diets and become vegetarian because it’s in line with their values, that’s admirable and should be applauded.

    Please don’t make fun of people who put time and energy into pursuing their values. Not if you don’t see yourself as a bully.


  • If someone is offended by this joke, maybe that’s a sign that they’re uncomfortable with the modern mass production of meat in general, and they’d be more comfortable within themselves if they ate less meat.

    Yes. It’s not possible to respect these lambs or consider yourself a friend to animals while looking forward to eating them. Not without playing tricks on your mind. The definitions of friend and respect simply don’t allow for simultaneously accepting a cruel fate.

    I am vegetarian (and striving to make more vegan choices day by day)

    ♥️

    Walked the same path. Vegan for just over a year now and no regrets. The benefits outweigh the downsides.


  • Sorry maybe I sounded a bit harsh. I think we’re on line here, but to be sure. I mean that the average voting age in 2006 could be an interesting detail when doing an analysis of the origins the current situation. So would other themes that played a role in the campaign before the election. I remember reading about this that the corruption of the alternative parties was an issue for voters too.

    But when it comes to justifying huge numbers of civilian casualties, it’s a pretty well established principle that civilians can never directly be held accountable with violence for the actions of their government. So that means that we don’t need to engage with arguments about whether voters knew what they were getting into or any specifics about the election. Because doing so would be giving in to your opponent (in a hypothetical debate) and you’d be undermining your own position.

    Maybe my points have the same problem. But since people who support the bombings don’t seem to care about international law, I felt like these were a good second line of defence.


  • I wrote this on Reddit to argue against someone who suggested that Israel’s response is justified, given that Hamas won an election. Here’s what I responded:

    There are several significant issues with your reasoning:

    1. Voting has never implied being responsible for the crimes of your government.
    2. There have not been elections since 2006. The Gaza Strip does not have a democratic system. This further challenges the argument that the population should pay some kind of price.
    3. Hamas won the elections by taking 74 of the 132 seats in parliament. This means that 60 seats were for non-hamas participants of these elections. Consequently, many people who are trapped in Gaza and want nothing to do with Hamas are being punished/killed.
    4. About 50% of the Gaza population is under 15 years of age. Attacking Gaza in this way should never have been on the table given these demographics.

    In other words, the average voting age isn’t too relevant.





  • What do you think raping and massacring people at a music festival is going to do?

    Nothing, just cause more suffering. But this isn’t a bad guy vs good guy argument. The point that’s being made is that extremism tends to be a product of its environment.

    Please note that this is not an anti-Israel line of arguing.

    Conditions in Gaza are terrible and many people have lost loved ones during their lives there. It creates an environment where extremism can flourish. It’s not a certainty, but the probability is just much higher in environments that are severely deprived.

    The actions of Hamas are inexcusable, and Israel will surely want to bring them to justice. But after that it’s time to acknowledge that if conditions in Gaza are kept as poor as they are, the chances of this type of violence happening again are almost guaranteed. It’s also in the interest of Israel to allow and facilitate improved conditions in Gaza.